THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO news and tidbits

Sophie · Post by **Sophie** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:21 am

Just saw the trailer!

It is going to be GOOOOOD

Aimee84 · Post by **Aimee84** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:51 am

Spoiler question*

Do you reckon in the movie they will have the Blomkvist and Cecilia affair??? or maybe tone it down a little?

caramel · Post by **caramel** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:15 am

Aimee84 wrote:Spoiler question*

Do you reckon in the movie they will have the Blomkvist and Cecilia affair??? or maybe tone it down a little?

I remember reading way in the beginning of filming that Blomkvist sleeps only with Lisbeth. Compared to the book he is less promiscuous

Don't know if thats true.

sasha · Post by **sasha** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:18 am

Aimee84 wrote:Spoiler question*

Do you reckon in the movie they will have the Blomkvist and Cecilia affair??? or maybe tone it down a little?

I think it was said that they want to make Blomkvist less promiscuous.
It was in WMagazine (interview with Fincher) "it departs rather dramatically from the book. Blomkvist is less promiscuous, Salander is more aggressive, and, most notably, the ending—the resolution of the drama—has been completely changed."

Read More http://www.wmagazine.com/celebrities/20 ... z1OBTcEb2y

sasha · Post by **sasha** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:53 am

caramel wrote:
Aimee84 wrote:Spoiler question*

Do you reckon in the movie they will have the Blomkvist and Cecilia affair??? or maybe tone it down a little?
I remember reading way in the beginning of filming that Blomkvist sleeps only with Lisbeth. Compared to the book he is less promiscuous Don't know if thats true.

Sorry caramel, couldn't see your post, it looks like we posted almost simultaneously.

Aimee84 · Post by **Aimee84** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:29 am

Damn

well it seems we got one sex scene in there lol i wont complain anymore lol

Germangirl · Post by **Germangirl** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:35 am

Yup, its such a waste

JEC57 · Post by **JEC57** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:01 am

Germangirl wrote:Yup, its such a waste

Depends on the scene and how long it lasts!

I would rather have one really good scene, than several like the beginning of FOAF where the action cannot clearly be seen!

Germangirl · Post by **Germangirl** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:12 am

http://www.laineygossip.com/Internation ... =0&CelID=0

What do you think? Is he protective in the poster. What is he, if not?

To me, it always was those two against them baddies - they helped each other CLEARLY, when ever the need occured. So in my book, they are protective of each other...

JEC57 · Post by **JEC57** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:45 am

Germangirl wrote:http://www.laineygossip.com/Internation ... =0&CelID=0

What do you think? Is he protective in the poster. What is he, if not?

To me, it always was those two against them baddies - they helped each other CLEARLY, when ever the need occured. So in my book, they are protective of each other...

I don't see his pose as being protective.

I see it as the two of them against the world.....a partnership of fractured personalities, trying to find the truth and heal themselves along the way.

Germangirl · Post by **Germangirl** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:48 am

JEC57 wrote:
Germangirl wrote:http://www.laineygossip.com/Internation ... =0&CelID=0

What do you think? Is he protective in the poster. What is he, if not?

To me, it always was those two against them baddies - they helped each other CLEARLY, when ever the need occured. So in my book, they are protective of each other...
I don't see his pose as being protective.

I see it as the two of them against the world.....a partnership of fractured personalities, trying to find the truth and heal themselves along the way.

But they DO come to each others help every so often - so yes - two against the world but still protective of each other, no? Maybe I miss an english term for that. -

trueblue · Post by **trueblue** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:43 am

Magazine article

Bigger

http://www.filmonair.com/magazine/artic ... gon-tattoo

SmittenDramaKitten · Post by **SmittenDramaKitten** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:18 pm

JEC57 wrote:
sf2la wrote:
JEC57 wrote: Imo, Daniel's career is not and never was about Bond. It's about meaty, hard, complex roles like this. Roles which other actors can only dream about having enough talent to even contemplate trying.
There are no truer words.

Fortunately Bond got him the attention he's deserved for all these years. It's so fantastic that he got this role. I thought Daniel was offered the role. Does anyone know if Pitt was seriously considered?
As far as I know, Pitt was not offered it. Lots of names were thrown around but from I remember, Daniel was first choice. The huge question-mark, one which served to bring Pitt's name up again and again, was whether Daniel could fit it all in because of his commitment to Bond.

Also, from what I remember from the gossip (so salt may be needed!) was that Pitt really wanted the role. No disrespect to him, but he is just not up to a role like this. Blomqvist needs an actor who can reach the depths of a tortured soul, and no-one does that better in today's choice of lead male actors than Daniel.[/quote]

I agree with your comments JEC but I don't want him to be a "tortured soul"!!! Since posting my comments last weekend, I have thought about it some more and wonder if Daniel doesn't take the 'dark shadows' home with him. He seems pretty ebullient and feisty as a person and yet I also believe he is quite sensitive. I would imagine him saying 'I'm just fine thanks' if anyone asked him but do we truly think that he walked off the Dragon Tattoo set every day feeling perfectly normal???? That is my concern for Daniel generally speaking. The movie is still damn hot and a potentially amazing, galvanizing and raw cinema experience........

Germangirl · Post by **Germangirl** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:42 pm

NextBondGirl wrote:
JEC57 wrote:
sf2la wrote: There are no truer words.

Fortunately Bond got him the attention he's deserved for all these years. It's so fantastic that he got this role. I thought Daniel was offered the role. Does anyone know if Pitt was seriously considered?
As far as I know, Pitt was not offered it. Lots of names were thrown around but from I remember, Daniel was first choice. The huge question-mark, one which served to bring Pitt's name up again and again, was whether Daniel could fit it all in because of his commitment to Bond.

Also, from what I remember from the gossip (so salt may be needed!) was that Pitt really wanted the role. No disrespect to him, but he is just not up to a role like this. Blomqvist needs an actor who can reach the depths of a tortured soul, and no-one does that better in today's choice of lead male actors than Daniel.[/quote]

I agree with your comments JEC but I don't want him to be a "tortured soul"!!! Since posting my comments last weekend, I have thought about it some more and wonder if Daniel doesn't take the 'dark shadows' home with him. He seems pretty ebullient and feisty as a person and yet I also believe he is quite sensitive. I would imagine him saying 'I'm just fine thanks' if anyone asked him but do we truly think that he walked off the Dragon Tattoo set every day feeling perfectly normal???? That is my concern for Daniel generally speaking. The movie is still damn hot and a potentially amazing, galvanizing and raw cinema experience........
I don`t think, you need to worry about that, he said in an interview, that he can switch off quite easily and I do believe that. He is in it so long and knows, how to do it IMO.

Daniel_Craig · Post by **Daniel_Craig** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 2:09 pm