can i be incluided? i bet in antoehr psot two years natural or adopetedGermangirl wrote:OK, I say NO child - but I give you 2 years. If i win, I fly over to meet up with you and Boss and K and you have to bear with me for a week or so.sf2la wrote:You got it! I only thought Sats was pregnant because she was MIA. Never dreamt they had broken up. This time I believe they BOTH WANT a child. So yeah. I'll even up the ante. You name the bet.Germangirl wrote:
Lets have another bet, sf. (We had one over Sats pregnancy and I won) I say again - no baby for them ..
You say, what you would want, if you win...
The "OMG I can't belive he's Married!!" Thread
Moderator: Germangirl
- calypso
- Posts: 17284
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:55 pm
- Location: Knitting willy warmers for Daniel's pickle!
I don't want to wait for two years before you visit, so we'll have to think up something else! And of course, Luna, you can be included too! But we're talking being pregnant, not having the baby, right?calypso wrote:can i be incluided? i bet in antoehr psot two years natural or adopetedGermangirl wrote:OK, I say NO child - but I give you 2 years. If i win, I fly over to meet up with you and Boss and K and you have to bear with me for a week or so.sf2la wrote: You got it! I only thought Sats was pregnant because she was MIA. Never dreamt they had broken up. This time I believe they BOTH WANT a child. So yeah. I'll even up the ante. You name the bet.
You say, what you would want, if you win...
- calypso
- Posts: 17284
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:55 pm
- Location: Knitting willy warmers for Daniel's pickle!
i think they will have baby within two yearssf2la wrote:I don't want to wait for two years before you visit, so we'll have to think up something else! And of course, Luna, you can be included too! But we're talking being pregnant, not having the baby, right?calypso wrote:can i be incluided? i bet in antoehr psot two years natural or adopetedGermangirl wrote: OK, I say NO child - but I give you 2 years. If i win, I fly over to meet up with you and Boss and K and you have to bear with me for a week or so.
You say, what you would want, if you win...
- calypso
- Posts: 17284
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:55 pm
- Location: Knitting willy warmers for Daniel's pickle!
i think they will have baby within 1 1/2 years thensf2la wrote:I don't want to wait for two years before you visit, so we'll have to think up something else! And of course, Luna, you can be included too! But we're talking being pregnant, not having the baby, right?calypso wrote:can i be incluided? i bet in antoehr psot two years natural or adopetedGermangirl wrote: OK, I say NO child - but I give you 2 years. If i win, I fly over to meet up with you and Boss and K and you have to bear with me for a week or so.
You say, what you would want, if you win...
I actually think so too and believe they will not practice birth control at their first opportunity. But what if we are off a month? Lose the bet because of one month?calypso wrote:i think they will have baby within two yearssf2la wrote:I don't want to wait for two years before you visit, so we'll have to think up something else! And of course, Luna, you can be included too! But we're talking being pregnant, not having the baby, right?calypso wrote: can i be incluided? i bet in antoehr psot two years natural or adopeted
I think if they don't have the baby within next 2 years give or take a couple months, it ain't happening. RW will be 43. Isn't that a bit risky then? I mean it would be considered a risky pregnancy, right?sf2la wrote:I actually think so too and believe they will not practice birth control at their first opportunity. But what if we are off a month? Lose the bet because of one month?calypso wrote:i think they will have baby within two yearssf2la wrote: I don't want to wait for two years before you visit, so we'll have to think up something else! And of course, Luna, you can be included too! But we're talking being pregnant, not having the baby, right?
How can anything that involves HHH sperm be risky? There's magic in those loins.caramel wrote:I think if they don't have the baby within next 2 years give or take a couple months, it ain't happening. RW will be 43. Isn't that a bit risky then? I mean it would be considered a risky pregnancy, right?sf2la wrote:I actually think so too and believe they will not practice birth control at their first opportunity. But what if we are off a month? Lose the bet because of one month?calypso wrote: i think they will have baby within two years
I say no baby because I always imagined [total speculation to follow--I am a writer after all ] that Daniel and Sats didn't marry because she was still young and probably wanted children. He knew that he did not want to do parenting again at his age, so he put her off and made promises and gave an engagement ring hoping she changes her mind about a kid. Now it's been five years, she is still putting the pressure on...sf2la wrote:You got it! I only thought Sats was pregnant because she was MIA. Never dreamt they had broken up. This time I believe they BOTH WANT a child. So yeah. I'll even up the ante. You name the bet.Germangirl wrote:
Lets have another bet, sf. (We had one over Sats pregnancy and I won) I say again - no baby for them ..
Meanwhile Daniel gets to know Rachel on the set, and here is a woman who is more mature. She already has a child so she has ticked that need off the list. She gives him no pressure for kids and marriage, only to be friends and enjoy life together.
Either Sats leaves because of no progress/no child, or he leaves her because he knows he just can't give her what he wants. He knows he is too busy now to be a good parent and enjoy any children anyway.
Again, this is all my speculation, but I always figured that Sats ended up calling things off because her biological clock was ticking and Daniel was not cooperating. RW's clock is already winding down, on the other hand. I'm 40, and believe me, even for the love of my life,even for DANIEL, I don't think you couldn't compel me to pump out another child.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47072
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
The strong, sexy woman who took Bond off the market
27 JUNE 2011 Surprise! Celebrities who shun the spotlight to say 'I do' in secret
It's been noted that the new 007 goes for girls who are more than just a pretty face - these strong, intelligent women are very much the 21st-century Bond girls.
And in real life, Daniel Craig has followed in the footsteps of his famous alter ego.
The cine hunk has secretly tied the knot with Rachel Weisz - a top-flight actress with a Cambridge degree and an Oscar to her name.
http://www.hellomagazine.com/celebritie ... married/1/
Daniel Craig: The allure of Hollywood's blue-eyed boy
http://www.hellomagazine.com/celebritie ... d-films/1/
27 JUNE 2011 Surprise! Celebrities who shun the spotlight to say 'I do' in secret
It's been noted that the new 007 goes for girls who are more than just a pretty face - these strong, intelligent women are very much the 21st-century Bond girls.
And in real life, Daniel Craig has followed in the footsteps of his famous alter ego.
The cine hunk has secretly tied the knot with Rachel Weisz - a top-flight actress with a Cambridge degree and an Oscar to her name.
http://www.hellomagazine.com/celebritie ... married/1/
Daniel Craig: The allure of Hollywood's blue-eyed boy
http://www.hellomagazine.com/celebritie ... d-films/1/
The top notch acting in the Weisz/Craig/Spall 'Betrayal' is emotionally true, often v funny and its beautifully staged with filmic qualities..
- calypso
- Posts: 17284
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:55 pm
- Location: Knitting willy warmers for Daniel's pickle!
si, but they msut take this off now out of resepct for sats surely yes?Germangirl wrote:The strong, sexy woman who took Bond off the market
27 JUNE 2011 Surprise! Celebrities who shun the spotlight to say 'I do' in secret
It's been noted that the new 007 goes for girls who are more than just a pretty face - these strong, intelligent women are very much the 21st-century Bond girls.
And in real life, Daniel Craig has followed in the footsteps of his famous alter ego.
The cine hunk has secretly tied the knot with Rachel Weisz - a top-flight actress with a Cambridge degree and an Oscar to her name.
http://www.hellomagazine.com/celebritie ... married/1/
Daniel Craig: The allure of Hollywood's blue-eyed boy
http://www.hellomagazine.com/celebritie ... d-films/1/
http://www.hellomagazine.com/profiles/satsuki-mitchell/
-
- Posts: 9682
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:25 pm
-
- Posts: 9682
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:25 pm