http://www.sendspace.com/file/jlzmwhGermangirl wrote:Can't see it. A link anybody please.caramel wrote:There is a video of their RC posing here
http://www.gettyimages.co.jp/detail/%E5 ... /159564391
Golden Globes 2013
Moderator: Germangirl
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47065
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
Thanks so much, Kkhenton wrote:http://www.sendspace.com/file/jlzmwhGermangirl wrote:Can't see it. A link anybody please.caramel wrote:There is a video of their RC posing here
http://www.gettyimages.co.jp/detail/%E5 ... /159564391
The top notch acting in the Weisz/Craig/Spall 'Betrayal' is emotionally true, often v funny and its beautifully staged with filmic qualities..
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47065
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
I commented right away -. just full of himself and not even slightly like Daniel. I don't get it either. I think, it was once started and now people are just repeating the similarity.Dunda wrote:I just watched the recording from the Golden Globes.
Sorry, but I really can't understand how anybody can compare Jeremy Renner to Daniel. When he went on stage to present he had NO stage presence at all. Very, very blant.
The top notch acting in the Weisz/Craig/Spall 'Betrayal' is emotionally true, often v funny and its beautifully staged with filmic qualities..
I know there's not much DC love over in Lainey's world, but I do have to agree about Rachel's dress. Not her best. And DC certainly is not perpetually sweaty, despite appearances last night.
Worst Swiss Dot: Rachel Weisz
Look, I don’t want you to think I’m not in favour of change. I love change, and I loved the hint, last night, that the Golden Globes don’t have to be quite as formal all the time as the other shows. Shorter dresses said hello and all.
Do you think, though, that this is how we should be going, Weisz? Do you think this is a good example of how to change things up? Miles of see-through Swiss-Dot? Who does this benefit? I mean, I suppose it means you’ve honed your thighs to be the same circumference all the way down, but it doesn’t make it a good look.
I’m not like the rest of you; I think Daniel Craig is perpetually sweaty and his hair makes me feel a little sick to my stomach. I don’t hold him to high standards or anything but don’t you think he would have said “oh, darling, don’t do that”?
Or are these two so blinded by love they can’t see the mistakes they make?
http://www.laineygossip.com/Rachel-Weis ... obes/25671
Worst Swiss Dot: Rachel Weisz
Look, I don’t want you to think I’m not in favour of change. I love change, and I loved the hint, last night, that the Golden Globes don’t have to be quite as formal all the time as the other shows. Shorter dresses said hello and all.
Do you think, though, that this is how we should be going, Weisz? Do you think this is a good example of how to change things up? Miles of see-through Swiss-Dot? Who does this benefit? I mean, I suppose it means you’ve honed your thighs to be the same circumference all the way down, but it doesn’t make it a good look.
I’m not like the rest of you; I think Daniel Craig is perpetually sweaty and his hair makes me feel a little sick to my stomach. I don’t hold him to high standards or anything but don’t you think he would have said “oh, darling, don’t do that”?
Or are these two so blinded by love they can’t see the mistakes they make?
http://www.laineygossip.com/Rachel-Weis ... obes/25671
- Maybelline
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 11:19 pm
- Location: Germany
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47065
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
She said no. Like always said, no baby is going to happen. They have such a full life, have two kids and with Daniel being the so overly private, he would have a hard time getting a child of teir out of the limelight.
I don't like the dress too much either, but from the tweets and articles, they were still considered the ottest couple. What more can you ask in that context?
I don't like the dress too much either, but from the tweets and articles, they were still considered the ottest couple. What more can you ask in that context?
The top notch acting in the Weisz/Craig/Spall 'Betrayal' is emotionally true, often v funny and its beautifully staged with filmic qualities..
-
- Posts: 9682
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:25 pm
Lainey is a total B#tch to daniel, always has been, she has made it plain she does not like him in the past. I suppose she earns a living out of bad mouthing people, so i just ignore wot she says.
I like the dress, abit daring, but if u have it flaunt it i say, i dont think it is too over the top or anything, compared to some dresses on the market.
I like the dress, abit daring, but if u have it flaunt it i say, i dont think it is too over the top or anything, compared to some dresses on the market.
I still say that it's Rachel's mind and near-43-year-old ovaries, not Daniel, that will decide on whether or not they'll have a baby. No question to me that he'd do whatever she wants. I agree that they have the perfect life now, so why complicate it, but any woman who loves kids, with all the money in the world for nannies, schools, etc, and is married to HHH could decide to have that love child. It's just that it's getting late. I wouldn't put any weight on however she answered that question on the red carpet. No way would she ever say 'Yes' or ''Hopefully.' Omg, the bump-watch stories would have exploded. She could pull an Adele and keep secluded if she wanted to. It's been 3 months and no one yet knows the baby's name.
The one to benefit by no baby is ONE person - Ella. The sole heir (with likely small dispersements to others and charities, relatively speaking.) We don't know their wills or trusts, but Henry has his own father. It would be interesting to know how much D&R are in each other's wills. Maybe existing joint property only. Who knows. But I'd say it's Ella who stands to be the big 'winner' if she remains his only child.
The one to benefit by no baby is ONE person - Ella. The sole heir (with likely small dispersements to others and charities, relatively speaking.) We don't know their wills or trusts, but Henry has his own father. It would be interesting to know how much D&R are in each other's wills. Maybe existing joint property only. Who knows. But I'd say it's Ella who stands to be the big 'winner' if she remains his only child.