Thanks for stepping in at the right times! But you are so right, there are no personal attacks, and the dialogue is interesting.
My " c's " came back automatically
Like Caramel, I was just so happy to see the pics of them; it wouldn't matter what they wore unless they weren't stylish. That would have been a bummer. I don't think he dressed appropriately for a premier either, but he obviously doesn't care what people think of him, and he's deserved the right to dress as he pleases more than the next guy, I suppose, because he sure steps it up big time when necessary. The guy has been busy with DH, Tattoo, and C&A, dressing how they want him to dress, wearing his hair how they want him to, maybe he's just enjoying this wonderful break and not 'giving a shit' because the haircut and shave will come soon - Friday, right? -I also loved the protective way he is holding her hand - especially for just a 'rumored' couple - LOL.
The article posted on the Rachel thread quotes her long before her involvement with Daniel that she is an actress, not a celebrity. The two appear to have the same outlook on privacy, fame, and what is due to fans. Thankfully reports are nothing but positive regarding their interactions with fans.
$ab, when I said that the only negative comments I read about Rachel as a person are from this forum, I believe it's true, and I just find this to be a surprisingly strange place to find them given that Daniel has chosen her to be his love. Name a magazine article, watch a YouTube video, read ANYTHING, and she reeks of sweetness, elegance, and humor. I can't find a single bad word against her. So for me, who knew nothing about her before Daniel, I'm learning more and can find no reason not to like her. If someone else doesn't, that's their right.
I have one burning question though:
If Daniel had left Sats for another woman on the set of DH, be it a make-up artist, associate producer, whomever..., would people not like her either? Is it that no one can replace Sats - period? If that's not it, and it's strictly Rachel, I'd be interested to know which actresses would be accepted.
I understand for $ab, there is the element of betrayal, so I would assume any woman Daniel hooked up with under these circumstances wouldn't be accepted, but for others?
My position is that NONE of us knew Sats personally. She never even gave an interview. I liked her too, but I didn't know her. Since she is forever out of Daniel's life, how can I STILL be upset about her loss? At first, yes, it was a major shock, but Daniel made this decision. We have no choice but to move on. That or live in the past.
$abbatha wrote:After seeing these new piccies i wonder what is so good in its.
I mean Craig is definitely sloppy,Weisz at least seems apparently better dressed,but she seems to wear often the same bunch of clothes, this black tote looks seems exaclty the same as the S.Valentine night at the box,even the leather jacket seems the same she wore in past into some tv show,kimmel or letterman,which is no good for an actress,style is important and i can't say that she love comfy clothing,she wore often and rather the same exact clothes,in my opinion of course.
Lately Craig is in lack of good taste and style as well,in clothing at least ( here he wore :jacket+caringan+shirt all with different lenghts that create an horror look) he doesn't look so sloopy when he was paired to Mitchell.
I can dare to say that he substitued tha beanie,which i prefer most,to this untrendy baseball hat.He need some good shaving as well,definitely he's not dressed properly for a premiere.
Also the couple attitude is really weird,they not look to each other,both wore sunglasses,the only walking hand in hand,both still trying to avoid the press attention, even if i think that in this case the press it's no good at all,Craig is still an A line actor and press attention it's good to him,even if he dislike the press he's in need of the press.
Back to Weisz,i'm sorry SF but i really don't found in her nothing of nothing of interesting,she's in lack of everything to me.It's also quite unfair to claim the only from here came negative comments regarding Weisz.Maybe and mainly beacuse jj and other board web sites found Mitchell so inadequate?That's the reason why i guess now allway everyones are fine with Weisz,for me it's the exact converse,since i like Mitchell i can't say nothing good on Weisz,expecially if i think how this affair started,again basing on my pov.