Quantum of Solace

Visit here to read and post all the latest Daniel Craig-related news, TV/VCR(DVD) alerts, etc.

Moderator: Germangirl

User avatar
redluna
Posts: 3566
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 2:20 pm
Location: Germany

Post by redluna »

Germangirl wrote:Sorry - another german one - from soemone of the german Bond board, who has seen the film some weeks ago, when they had people invited for a Bond treat, that took about 2 or 3 days.

His critic is very good - so the mix of good and bad continues. But it seems, the film does very well with the germans and the british critics still haven´t decided, if they love or hate the film. It will be - IMO - a very controvers film that will split the fans.

Filmkritik zu Quantum Of Solace, von Gernot Seidl.
http://www.jamesbond.de/

Ich muss schon zugeben, die teilweise schlechten Kritiken der vor allem britischen Filmkritiker, die seit voriger Woche im Internet kursieren, haben mich (und viele andere Bondfans) schon ein wenig verunsichert. Aber ich kann euch gleich vorweg Entwarnung geben: EIN QUANTUM TROST ist ein sehr vielschichtiger, abwechslungsreicher, zynischer, actiongepackter & moderner Actionthriller - ein großartiger Bondfilm, ganz im Sinne von Ian Fleming.

Nun der Reihe nach: Ein Novum in der 46-jährigen Filmserie stellt natürlich die direkte Fortsetzung der Handlung aus Casino Royale dar, das Bonds Anfänge im britischen Geheimdienst zeigt. Allen, die Daniel Craigs ersten Bondfilm das letzte Mal vor 2 Jahren gesehen haben, rate ich, sich noch schnell die DVD zu besorgen, ansonsten könnte man bei der ein oder anderen Sequenz etwas ins Straucheln kommen, da immer wieder auf Ereignisse aus CR (Casino Royale) zurückgegriffen wird bzw. etliche Charaktere auch in EQT (EIN QUANTUM TROST) wiederkehren (zB. Felix Leiter, Mathis, Mr. White).

Die Story rund um Bonds Rachefeldzug wegen Vesper Lynds Tod aus CR erinnert natürlich ein wenig an Timothy Daltons “Lizenz zum Töten”, hat aber, wie sich im Laufe des Filmes herausstellt, weit mehr zu bieten. Bond (der sich sichtlich immer noch in seiner “Charakterentwicklung” befindet!) und das Hauptbondgirl Camille sind beide aus unterschiedlichen Gründen darauf aus, Dominic Greenes mysteriöse Verbrecherorganisation zu stoppen, gleichzeitig geizen die Drehbuchautoren Paul Haggis, Robert Wade & Neil Purvis sowie Regisseur Marc Forster aber auch nicht mit gesellschaftlicher Kritik an Wirtschaft und (Geheimdienst-) Politik und fassen einige brisante und aktuelle Themen auf, was man von einem Bondfilm nicht unbedingt gewohnt ist.

Der Film startet mit einer fulminanten und atemberaubenden Verfolgungsjagd mit dem Aston Martin in Italien, die uns einen netten Vorgeschmack auf die feine Machart der noch bevorstehenden Actionsequenzen gibt. Wie bei CR hat man auch die Pre-Title-Sequenz von EQT eher kurz gehalten.
Die Titelsequenz, zum ersten Mal vom MK12-Team kreiert, ist durchaus gelungen, beinhaltet einige bekannte Elemente aus vergangenen Zeiten, setzt aber keine neuen Maßstäbe. Der kontrovers diskutierte Titelsong “Another Way To Die” von Alicia Keys und Jack White, schlägt sich, wie vermutet, zusammen mit bewegten Bildern sehr gut und wird es sicherlich noch schaffen, den ein oder anderen Kritiker zu überzeugen (an die großen Bondklassiker wie etwa “Goldfinger”, “Diamonds Are Forever”, “Live And Let Die” oder “GoldenEye” kommt er zugegebener Maßen nicht heran).

Viel Zeit zum Ausruhen hat 007 in den 106 Filmminuten jedenfalls nicht. Schon lange nicht mehr ist Bond in einem seiner Abenteuer so viel gereist wie in diesem: Nach dem Verhör in Italien geht es für ein kurzes Briefing zurück nach London, danach nach Haiti, wieder zurück nach Europa ins österreichische Bregenz, wieder ein Abstecher nach Italien, danach nach Bolivien und sogar noch weiter.

Wie von den Produzenten angekündigt, bietet EQT deutlich mehr Actionsequenzen als sein Vorgänger. Und wie bereits aus CR gewohnt, sind die Action- und vor allem die Kampfszenen sehr schnell, hart, brutal und real gefilmt. Obwohl Bond im Film quasi von einer Actionszene in die nächste schlendert, gibt es jedoch immer wieder auch ruhigere Sequenzen, die dem Zuseher (und 007 :)) ein wenig Zeit zum Verschnaufen geben. Die Non-Stop-Action wirkt dennoch nicht störend (man muss natürlich auf Action gefasst sein - aber hey, das ist ein Bondfilm!), denn Marc Forster hat es geschafft, mit den einzelnen Actionsequenzen die Handlung voranzutreiben und hält so den Spannungsbogen stets aufrecht. Vielleicht hätte Forster bei der ein oder anderen (Action-) Szene mit weniger Schnitten auskommen können, aber er ist damit noch im Rahmen geblieben.
Eine der besten Verfolgungsjagden des Filmes zeigt Forster zusammen mit Aufnahmen aus Puccinis “Tosca” auf der Bregenzer Festspielbühne, die ganze Sequenz erinnert an den großen Francis Ford Coppola - genial!

Aber auch die ruhigeren Bilder beinhalten etliche tolle “Bondmomente”, so dürfen sich Bondfans etwa auf einen Dialog aus Ian Flemings Originalroman “Casino Royale” freuen, es gibt jede Menge trockenen britischen Humor (Bonds legendäre One-Liner sind wieder mitdabei) und auch die berühmte Gunbarrel-Sequenz kehrt wieder zurück, wenn auch in etwas modifizierter Form. Trotz der relativ knappen Filmlänge und der vielen Schauplätze nimmt sich Forster immer wieder ein wenig Zeit und versucht durch Aufnahmen von Menschen und Landschaften ein stimmiges und authentisches Bild der jeweiligen Location zu überliefern, was ihm oft auch bis ins kleinste Detail gelingt. Q, Moneypenny oder “Mein Name ist Bond, James Bond” tauchen in EQT nicht auf (was mich persönlich nicht stört, da zu einem Bondfilm mehr als das gehört), werden aber in den folgenden Abenteuern sicherlich wieder zurückkehren, wenn sich die Einführung als passend erweist.

Natürlich wäre es kein Marc-Forster-Film, wenn man nicht auch auf die einzelnen Charaktere eingehen würde. So sehen wir zwischen der vielen harten Action auch den “anderen” Bond, dem, wie im Vorgängerfilm CR, noch Fehler unterlaufen, der sich jedoch ständig weiterentwickelt und aus Kummer und Verzweiflung auch gerne den ein oder anderen Drink zu sich nimmt (auch hier sei ein Verweis auf Flemings Originalbond angebracht). Schließlich gibt es dann auch noch jene Szenen, die man bisher nur selten bis gar nicht in den Bondfilmen gesehen hat, die diesen Film einzigartig und Daniel Craigs Bond menschlich und nachvollziehbar machen und ihn somit zurück zu Ian Flemings Wurzeln führen (welche Szene ich damit ua. meine, werdet ihr spätestens bei eurem ersten Kinobesuch merken).

Neben dem wieder genial aufspielenden Daniel Craig, der in EQT erneut eine weltklasse Performance hinlegt (physisch topfit, hart, brutal, ironisch, in der einen Szene unantastbar, in der nächsten verletzt und völlig mitgenommen) und spätestens jetzt jeden seiner Kritiker verstummen lässt, wird der Film natürlich von Schauspielgrößen wie Mathieu Amalric und Judi Dench bereichert. Die hübsche Olga Kurylenko legt eine passable Leistung hin, Gemma Arterton (von der bis auf eine Homage an einen früheren Bondklassiker nur wenig zu sehen ist) und Anatole Taubman sind nur Randfiguren mit kurzen aber witzigen Auftritten.
Besonders hervorzuheben ist noch der wundervolle Giancarlo Giannini, der es schafft, seine tolle Darbietung aus CR noch einmal zu übertreffen und in eine der bewegendsten Szenen des Filmes involviert ist; vom großartigen Jeffrey Wright, der zum zweiten Mal Bonds loyalen CIA-Freund Felix Leiter mimt, hätte ich auch gerne noch mehr gesehen.

Alles in allem ist Marc Forsters EQT einerseits sicherlich ein untypischer, andererseits aber auch ein großartiger Bondfilm, mit rasanter & toll-gefilmter Action, einer ansprechenden Story, einer großen Portion trockenem (bondtypischen) Humor und vielen starken Momenten. Klar, wer mit der harten, menschlicheren und realistischen Gangart von CR und Daniel Craigs Bond nicht viel anfangen konnte, der wird wohl auch mit EQT seine Schwierigkeiten haben. Wer aber, so wie ich, auf die filmische Ausgabe von Ian Flemings Geheimagenten aus den Originalromanen gewartet hat (die bereits mit CR erfolgreich in die Filmwelt eingeführt wurde), der wird in Daniel Craigs zweitem Bondabenteuer mehr als EIN QUANTUM TROST wiederfinden…

Insgesamt bekommt EIN QUANTUM TROST von mir 9/10 Punkte (ich tendierte zwischen 8.5 und 9), wobei das heute sicherlich nicht mein letzter Kinobesuch war und es mir wirklich nicht leicht gefallen ist, so kurz nach dem 1. Ansehen bereits ein Review zu verfassen ;)
Thanks for the great review GG!
I decided some days ago that I don't read any review before watching the movie but this was worth reading :D
Image
advicky
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:37 pm

Post by advicky »

Daniel Craig Finds Secret Agent Solace
By Jordan Riefe

After making a lot of 007 traditionalist naysayers eat their words with his reinvention of James Bond in Casino Royale, Daniel Craig steps back into the shoes of the world's most famous cinematic secret agent for the follow-up Quantum of Solace. Picking up only minutes after Casino Royale, Quantum of Solace sees Daniel Craig as Bond on a quest for truth after the death of his love Vesper, who betrayed him in the first film. What he finds is a trail of global deceit, murder, and a ruthless businessman connected to a mysterious organization responsible for a web of international corruption and control.

So how does Daniel Craig feel about playing bond for a second time? Luckily our own Deadbolt spy was on hand at the official Quantum of Solace press conference in Beverly Hills where the press interrogated Daniel Craig about the secrets within the sequel, how keeps a low profile in the public eye, whether he was approached to play the almighty Thor, and how he finds his own solace away from the Bond franchise.

What happened to your arm?

DANIEL CRAIG: I got some surgery done six weeks ago to stitch me back up. I got a, I don't know, rotator cuff or something.

Were you surprised or knew in advance that this would be a direct sequel to a Bond movie?

CRAIG: It just seemed to me when we came down to it, and we all agreed that, to my mind, at the end of Casino Royale, it was sort of the beginning of the story as opposed to the end of a story. He'd fallen in love, he'd had his heart broken, this organization that they'd discovered, they'd just sort of started peeling back the onion skins of. To do another movie and just sort of go, ‘Oh, there was this chick once,’ seemed to be the wrong thing to do. So it just fit. I don't know when the idea came up. I have no idea.

Is it a great acting challenge to play a more emotionally shut off Bond versus gregarious witty Connery?

CRAIG: I would never do that because I'd never copy somebody else. I would never do an impression of anybody else, or try and improve on what they did. That would be a pointless exercise for me. I had to find out how I was going to do this, and these two movies have tied that in for me. I'm now in a sort of situation - well, I think we've wrapped up all the loose ends. We've solidified the relationship with M. We've solidified the relationship with Felix Leiter and we can do anything now. I think he's going to be probably a little more relaxed in the next movie, but he had a deal to do, business to do.

How much fun are you having as Bond?

CRAIG: I mean, these movies are...

The arm in a sling.

CRAIG: This would've needed doing anyway. It's fantastic. These movies are an amazing experience to shoot and they're an amazing experience to work with the people I work with. Marc Forster on this has been a joy to work with. I'm a big fan of his movies, so I'd love to have worked with him on any other movie. The whole collaborative effort of making a movie like this, it's a big deal. It's a really, really big deal. There were a thousand people who worked on this movie. At any one time, I'll be working with two-to-three hundred people. We shot this for six months. It's a long time since I've been on a movie set on the last day of shooting where the First A.D. goes, ‘Okay, everyone, ladies and gentleman, that's a wrap.’ And everybody looked around at each other and just went, ‘Okay, we've done something here.’ It was a huge thing, and I think it's on the screen. I think it's up there.

Were you relieved that Casino Royale turned out so well?

CRAIG: Of course I was. I was amazed, stunned that it did so well, absolutely stunned.

You look like you’re having fun, but you don't like the intrusion of the press though?

CRAIG: This is different. That's separate. The unwanted attention is separate. I'm selling a movie here and happily selling a movie because I want people to go and see this, but the unwanted attention from press is a completely separate issue.

How have you dealt with it?

CRAIG: By not coming out and - there are moments. At the moment there's a lot of attention, so I'm getting some unwanted attention. That's as simple as that.

They follow you around?

CRAIG: It's happened. Believe me, it does happen but I get away. I go away and just get - I've got a very - I'm sure I've spoken to you about this, my private life is incredibly important to me and that's what I protect as much as I possibly can.

Is it easy to do that?

CRAIG: No. It's costly.

Do you employ bodyguards?

CRAIG: No. I have to keep myself private by not being too public, so therefore I don't encourage my own publicity. I try, it sounds like, 'I want to be alone' but it's not. It genuinely isn't. I'm not like that. I love this job and I love the whole aspect of if you produce something, you should get it out there.

The British press can be merciless.

CRAIG: That's the way it is. I'm not denying their right to publish. That would be - but there are certain things that are private and I need to protect: family, friends, as I said, they're the main deal.

There's only so much vulnerability people want to see in Bond.

CRAIG: You sure? Really?

We've never seen him that way before.

CRAIG: I think we've finished, we've tail-ended these. These movies stand up alone. They're two very separate movies, two stylistically separate movies, but we've completed the circle in these movies. We can do anything.

Is there a line you worked with on the emotional vulnerability?

CRAIG: No, I don't know how - but again, that's that thing of saying I would be doing an impression of something that had been done before. I'm just applying what I know and with working with someone like Marc - we know about making movies. But it's a Bond movie and I think all the subtleties are there, which you see: the music, the style, the whole thing, they're classically Bond. It's just we're f**king around with it. It's enjoyable to do, but that doesn't mean we won't get more - I feel now we're in a situation where I do genuinely believe we can have a submarine base in the next one. I'd love it. We could. Now that's going to be printed, "We're going into..."

You could sleep with more women.

CRAIG: I could do, yes.

Would you like a ski chase in the next one?

CRAIG: I'm not a very good skier, Jesus! I think my Bond actually slides down the hill on a blanket. I don't think there's a lot of that going on.

How were the stunts this time?

CRAIG: We set the bar on Casino, so we had to try and achieve and try and make these different but as good. And things have moved on. Special effects have moved on. We certainly didn't want to make this a more CGI-based movie. But the plane sequence, which insists that we have CGI - I think the freefall sequence was incredible to do because we went and learned to freefall. We had a conversation about the freefall sequence. I was like, 'I've never seen a good one.' I think they're always kind of - There's obviously people freefalling, and then they have a close-up of somebody with a hair dryer.

That always seemed to me, the way, and they always last about five minutes longer than they should. So I said, 'It has to be quick. They have to look like they're falling out of the plane.' And someone came up with the idea [that] there's this 200 mile an hour vertical wind tunnel where people go and learn how to freefall and you can do it. So Olga and I went and rehearsed for about a week on it, and we stuck a camera, a guy cameraman with a small camera flying with a controller. We had 20 digital cameras around and I think just, you look at it, it was hell, but it looks like we're falling out of an airplane.

People seriously reported your jokes about making it funnier. Do people not get your deadpan?

CRAIG: I mean, I'm sorry, I probably say stupid things in interviews sometimes but I'm not nailing anything down. People kind of want to know exactly what's going to happen in the next movie and I don't know. Is there room for more comedy? Yes, there's room for more comedy.

But it amused me that people took the joke seriously. Do you find people don't get you sometimes?

CRAIG: I think that's the same for everybody. The thing is, I'm not that complicated, I don't think. I'm a pretty open book. I make gags, and if people don't get them, I can't please everybody.

Isn't there still a question of the Quantum organization? Mr. White?

CRAIG: I mean, I don't know, maybe.

Will there be another SPECTRE?

CRAIG: Well, I think we've set that up. There could be. I genuinely - I don't like films that tie everything up at the end. I like an open ending. I want an audience to go away asking those questions and hopefully they'll continue asking those questions into the next movie we do.

How important is it to choose other un-Bond-like characters?

CRAIG: I don't consciously try to choose un-Bond-like projects. I mean, I certainly wouldn't go and choose another spy. That would just seem to me - because I could go away and say, 'Okay, I'm going to do something completely the opposite of that.' That seems to me to be counterproductive. That just means that I'm just going to be, ‘Oh, look, it's a response.’ I'm not a reactionary person, so I wouldn't go, ‘Oh, Christ, I've done that. I must do something to counterbalance that.’ That's not my job.

What are you looking for?

CRAIG: Good scripts.

What will you say no to?

CRAIG: Nothing at all.

Would you play Thor?

CRAIG: I said no.

They asked you to?

CRAIG: I'm not going to tell you that.

Are you signed for three more Bonds?

CRAIG: Two.

Would you like to go on for 20 years?

CRAIG: I haven't got that in me. Jesus Christ, someone else should do it by then. Look, I will do them as long as I can. I can't see beyond another movie. If they ask me back to do another movie, I would be thrilled. I would be thrilled.

Talk about going toe to toe with Olga during shooting?

CRAIG: Well, there's obviously a story about vengeance in this story, but actually Bond isn't on a mission of vengeance. I mean, he's angry, he's pissed off and all those things, but actually he ties into this title which seems to work better and better the more I talk about it. He wants to find his quantum of solace. He wants to find the peace within himself because he lost somebody.

Actually, Olga's character is on a mission of vengeance and that's why he can step back and say, 'Okay, I'm going to help you out. I'm going to help you get your goal, but understand I don't think it's the right thing to be doing. I think you're going to screw yourself up.'... So Olga's character, I just think is, there's strength in it. Just like Gemma's character, Fields, is so great because they get together and it's lovely and it's a bit of fun...

Any person from history you'd like to be friends with? Ian Fleming?

CRAIG: No, I can't, the smoking, the drinking, the smoking, the drinking. That's tough. I wish you'd warned me about that one. The kind of people that come to mind, it would've been lovely to have met Kennedy. It would've been lovely to have met Queen Elizabeth. I would have been somebody you would have liked to at least walked into the room and had a peek. I don't know if you'd have ever gotten a hundred yard with her but that would've been quite interesting. Certainly somebody - John Lennon.

What are your thoughts on handling of Golden Compass, and they might not complete that trilogy?

CRAIG: I don't know what to say. It failed here. To their mind I think it failed here, unfortunately. It did fantastically worldwide. Warner Bros. have it, so you'll have to lobby them. I'd love them to do it again because I love the books. I think there's a great story to tell.

What happened with Invasion?

That was creepy and fun.

CRAIG: I think it could've been creepier. Again, I think that kind of got hijacked a bit, to my mind.

After you play Thor...

CRAIG: I'm not doing it, I said no.

They did offer it to you?

CRAIG: They spoke about it, but I just thought I can't play Bond and Thor. What am I, on some stupid f**king power trip? I can't imagine. Blonde hair and a big hammer.

You'd be making some statement.

CRAIG: It would've been too much of a statement and physically, this is kind of as physical as I want to get in movies at the moment. To go and do another role that's just as physical...

What's next?

CRAIG: I don't know.

How much of the bruises are makeup versus real?

CRAIG: No, it's all makeup.

But you do so much, were you ever scared?

CRAIG: Never scared because we rehearse and rehearse. I don't just go stand on the roof and jump off it. We rehearse it. Hard to believe, I know, but it is the truth. We rehearsed it. Worried that I might get it wrong and worried that I'm going to have to do it more than once? So some of them I only did once. The bus jump was weird. The bus jump was a strange one. I jumped out of a window, the impact is somebody else, I think, although I did an impact. Then I do the stop, and then I jump off and climb up the thing. That's all me.

Why?

CRAIG: Why? Beats working for a living I suppose, jumping out of a window into an oncoming bus. I kept standing there going - because we didn't have the bus in rehearsals. We had an idea of where the bus would be in rehearsals. So your mind goes [wonky]. But actually the fourth time I did it, actually, I was putting in a flourish at the end as I was jumping out.

Like Douglas Fairbanks?

CRAIG: Yeah, ha-ha!

Would you like to see Q and Moneypenny?

CRAIG: I'd love to, yeah, love to. I think, though you offer it to the best actors you can and you say to them, 'Forget what's happened. Reinvent it. Tell us what you think these characters should be.' That's where it should come from because what they do is a given. How they are is a given.

You seem comfortable working with Judi Dench.

CRAIG: Very lovely. Every time we do a scene together it's easy. She just makes my job easy because I have total confidence in her.

She ad libbed?

CRAIG: She messed around a bit. She did, I think she messed around. I don't think she ad libbed that much, but she did mess around a bit.

How did it feel to do that iconic Iris walk?

CRAIG: That was probably when I was scared. That was probably the moment when I was actually kind of had a - I just went. We did that twice.

Two walks?

CRAIG: Well, we filmed it twice. How many times I did it, over and over again. I was watching it on a monitor. I think we got it right.

And when you saw it the first time?

CRAIG: I just loved it because I snap out because I'm not looking. The sound, 'ba dum, bad dum, bum.' We wanted to keep it, there were ideas to sort of f**k around with that and make it into sort of a bit more graphic and things, and I was just like, 'No, no, no, no, it has to be like the old ones, almost slightly jerky coming across like it was.'

Any Academy picks?

CRAIG: I am sadly - I haven't seen a thing. I'm about to go and sit down and watch, as soon as this is all over. I'm going to sit in a room and watch a ton of movies. I've seen The Wrestler, it's great. I love it. Whether it's an Oscar performance, I couldn't tell you.

If Casino Royale hadn't been so good, would you have been more nervous coming back?

CRAIG: Yes. Definitely.

http://www.thedeadbolt.com/news/105157/ ... erview.php
Germangirl
Moderator
Posts: 47073
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Germangirl »

VERY positive again from Zorin at CBN

http://debrief.commanderbond.net/index. ... 50535&st=0
The top notch acting in the Weisz/Craig/Spall 'Betrayal' is emotionally true, often v funny and its beautifully staged with filmic qualities..

Image
User avatar
bumblebee
Posts: 15193
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: British in USA

Post by bumblebee »

This is Jay Leno writing in The Times about Daniel's recent appearance on his show and the cars in the movie:

This is vile car abuse, Mr Bond

Jay Leno

As I look back on my life, I can say I’ve achieved something that not many men can say they’ve achieved. I’ve met every James Bond personally, from Sean Connery to Daniel Craig, who has just been a guest on my show. He’s quite impressive. Not since Connery has a James Bond had this much of an edge.

Occasionally I’ll run into George Lazenby, riding motorcycles in Los Angeles. Pierce Brosnan was a frequent guest on my show. And, of course, there’s Roger Moore, who I call the Pillsbury Doughbond. He was the least effective of all the Bonds for me because he just didn’t have that killer instinct.

Daniel Craig was a very enjoyable guest and definitely has that grittiness needed in a Bond film. I found him very self-deprecating and very funny. He’ll do a blockbuster and then he’ll go and do a little independent film next. The great difference between a lot of American actors and English actors is that English actors love to work. Another favourite of mine, Michael Caine, I believe recently broke the record — he has been in more than 3m films.

I’ve seen Quantum of Solace. It’s quite good. Dame Judi Dench adds a great deal of gravitas to her role:

“Try not to kill everybody, Bond,” she says. And you realise this Bond has a real revenge streak in him. He’s angry.

The new 007 movie also probably has the best Bond car since Sean Connery’s DB5. The Aston Martin DBS, which we saw flip over in the last film, Casino Royale, again gets wrecked, this time in the opening sequence when he’s driving through the tunnels around Lake Garda or some place. And he’s being chased by these guys in an Alfa Romeo sedan.

If I were Aston Martin I would be upset that they’ve beaten the car to death, ripped the doors off, smashed it into a tunnel and rolled it down a hill. I mean, the car is horribly abused. Like a lot of car guys, I don’t balk at people being shot or dismembered in films, but to see a car such as the DBS destroyed makes me shout out, “Stop the carnage!”

For me the two best Bond cars are the ones at either end of the spectrum — the two Astons. The DBS and the early DB5. The Aston in Quantum of Solace doesn’t have any special machineguns or a device that makes french fries or any of that nonsense, it’s just a regular standard Aston, but I think the gadgets will be back for the next Bond film. I’ve heard that from a pretty good source.

Although some people go crazy for the Lotus Esprit that turns into the submarine, hey I’m sorry, I don’t want my car to turn into a submarine. If my car goes into a lake it’s because I’m being an idiot.

Some things remain constant. Bond’s inability to outrun cars that in reality could never keep up with an Aston. Go back to Goldfinger and he’s being chased by a Mercedes sedan that must have 1,500 Koreans and Chinese in it and hanging out of the window, and he’s not able to beat them in his Aston Martin.

Remember that scene? They’re racing down the road and they’re right on his tail, but when you have an Aston Martin, just stepping on the gas would be enough. You wouldn’t need oil-slick ejectors and smokescreens to outrun bad guys cramped in a 50-year-old Mercedes.

I don’t think Daniel Craig is a real car guy. Obviously he’s a terrific actor and he liked the car and he told me he enjoyed driving it. He also told me that they offered him one, but said he would feel a little silly driving around LA in one. People would go, “Hey look, there’s a James Bond car — and look, there’s James Bond in it.”

I, on the other hand, happily borrowed the DBS for a few days. But then I am never going to be mistaken for 007.
Daskedusken
Posts: 14137
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:14 pm
Location: Always heading somewhere

Post by Daskedusken »

Product placement reportedly tops £50 million in `Quantum of Solace`
Quantum Of Solace - 26-10-08

My name is Bond... James Bond. Now, might I interest sir in the new Sony Eriksson mobile phone?" - reports The Scotsman.

It seems 007 now has more than a licence to kill; he has a licence to sell, and a very lucrative one. Quantum of Solace, the 22nd "official" outing of Britain's best known secret agent, released this week, has reportedly earned a record £50 million from manufacturers for "product placement", as these subtle, and sometimes not so subtle, adverts are known. It tops the previous record of £44 million for Die Another Day, a film so laden with plugs for 20 products that it sometimes resembled a big-budget Argos advert and was retitled by critics "Buy Another Day".

When Casino Royale was released in 2006 the number of advertising partners was cut to six. They still paid out a reported £36 million to have their wares touted in what turned out to be the most successful James Bond film so far. However, it was not always to the edification of the finished film. In one cringe-making scene, Vesper Lynd, the leading Bond girl, quizzed 007 on his choice of timepiece: "Rolex?" "No," he replied, "Omega", a choice that would have had Ian Fleming spinning in his grave.

For the author of the original novels was ahead of the game when it came to product placement, or, as he viewed it, luxury products that helped characterise the type of man about which he was writing. The James Bond of the printed page wears a Rolex Oyster, drives a Bentley 1933 Continental, collects his suits from Savile Row and pours Gordon's Gin, Smirnoff vodka and Tattinger Blanc de Blanc 1943.

Daniel Craig's revamped Bond, however, will drive a customised Aston Martin, wear his Omega watch and possibly sip from a bottle of Coca-Cola Zero, the soft drinks giant's latest beverage. His laptop and mobile phone will be Sony while his latest love interest will drive him around Panama in a Ford Ka.

Lucy Barrett, editor of Marketing magazine, described some of the new deals as "undignified". She explained: "As part of Ford's deal, in Casino Royale, our action hero had to drive a Ford Mondeo. This time around, Ford is using Quantum of Solace and a Bond girl to launch the updated Ka. It is aimed predominately at women, a largely untapped market for the Bond brand."

There is even a Bond Girl perfume, being launched by Avon, the mail order beauty firm. It is being fronted by Gemma Arterton, who plays Agent Fields. As Ms Barrett recently wrote: "It's not the smoothest or cleverest of tie-ups, but we should expect more women-targeted brands to get on board."

The shrewdest deal appears to have been struck by Ocean Sky, a British private jet company, which lent Eon Productions, the company that makes the Bond movies, five of its private jets, worth £100 million, for a week. In return the company is featured eight times in the film, including shots inside and outside its planes and a woman in an Ocean Sky uniform behind the company's branded check-in desk.

The cost to the company, which usually charges £5,000 an hour, was put at £600,000 but the potential exposure will be worth millions. The company's owner, Kurosh Tehranchian, 45, explained: "It was a major investment for us financially and in terms of plane usage but it is something we feel will be very worthwhile in terms of the exposure. The James Bond brand is unique. It is known worldwide, yet it is completely non-controversial: everyone likes it. It was something we wanted to be associated with."

It is a sentiment shared by Andy Payne, the global creative director of Interbrand, which specialises in brand development. He said most companies would leap at the chance to have their products appear in a Bond film. He said: "Companies will fight for the rights to be a partner and they'll pay considerable amounts of money to get the contract. Bond is cool and has kudos and that status rubs off on the products he is seen to endorse.

"For a company like Ocean Sky this could be a very good move because even though they have given up the use of five of their jets for a week, they will view the money lost as a good investment in terms of the amount of global brand identification they will achieve and the worldwide audience they'll reach."

While product placement in films has existed for decades – cigarette companies in particular used to pay large sums to have characters smoke their brands – it has become increasingly popular as a way of offsetting the huge costs of blockbusters and for companies to highlight their products.

Dr John McCarty, head of marketing at the College of New Jersey, said the huge growth in product placement was a direct consequence of the rise in the United States of video and digital recorders, which allowed people to record programmes and fast-forward ads. "Product placement is a way of getting the product to a person in a way they can't avoid," he said.

But does it work? For the product companies involved, it would appear so. In 1982, when ET started snacking on Reece's Pieces, sales spiked, while in 1964 Aston Martin sold more DB5s in one year than during the entire five-year production run of its predecessor.

"In general, it works best if it's not perceived as product placement; if it's natural," said Dr McCarty. "In the show Sex and the City, and the movie, they talked about a lot of brands of clothing. But those women in that situation would be expected to know about fashion, so it didn't seem unreasonable for them to mention those names. The problem is any time the storyline has become bogged down around the product, and it seems unrelated. There shouldn't be a tug between the people telling the story and the commercial enterprise."

Yet while the producers may welcome the extra cash and the manufacturers the publicity, not everyone is a lover of product placement. The director Ken Loach (granted it is difficult to imagine a man less likely to helm a James Bond film) is no fan of such an intimate mixture of commerce and art.

He recently said: "At best, it is an extraneous interference; at worst it subverts the film. It is something every director would be resisting."

Even James May, presenter of BBC2's Top Gear, has grown weary of it. He wrote: "I'm becoming rather tired with product placement. It begins with whatever mobile phone (Bond] uses, which seems to loom large on screen every five minutes. If you're the person responsible for brokering the deal by which this was achieved, I'd like to assure you, with some smugness, that I never noticed what make it was. Ha!"

Product placement has a long and distinguished history. The earliest example is believed to be found in the novel Around The World in Eighty Days by Jules Verne, which was published in 1873. As the author was already a renowned figure, a shipping company persuaded him to have Phileas Fogg, the novel's hero, travel on one of its ships.

While Ian Fleming used brand names in his James Bond novels, it was not for financial reward but as a means of characterisation, so the reader was aware that only the best would do for 007.

Perhaps the most extreme example of product placement in recent cinema history was the movie Somers Town, which was directed by Shane Meadows, but entirely financed to the tune of £500,000 by Eurostar. The film was shot against the background of the St Pancras Eurostar terminal, with the main characters travelling to Paris by Eurostar.

The use of products is not always in the manner in which the manufacturers might approve. In the film Fight Club, Apple and Volkswagen both paid to have their products featured, only to see Brad Pitt and Ed Norton break into an Apple store and later smash up the headlight of a Volkswagen Beetle.

In recent years, product placement has expanded rapidly in both movies and American television. Brandchannel, a company that monitors marketing, has since 2001 handed out "Film Whore" awards for the film that has contained the most product placement. The most recent winner was Sex and The City: The Movie, which featured 25 fashion designers, eight shops, seven electronic brands, seven publications, seven food and drinks brands, five cosmetic companies, three car companies and one airline. The average blockbuster, meanwhile, was found to feature 22.1 brands each. Ford, which features heavily in Quantum of Solace, was singled out in the awards for appearing in 57 per cent of the films that topped the US box office over the past year. The company also won the Scene Stealer award for the use of the Ford Mustang that appeared in I Am Legend.

Meanwhile, the rival car company Audi was awarded Best Off-Screen Support for the manner in which the company's R8 model, which appeared briefly in the film Iron Man, made an appearance at each of the film's premieres, with Robert Downey Jnr arriving at each event in the car. PQMedia recently estimated that the total yearly spend on product placement in America was between £3.5 and £5 billion.

http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?ite ... mi6&s=news
"Love anyway. Live anyway. Choose to part of this anyway”
JoniJoni
Posts: 2296
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:00 am

Post by JoniJoni »

James Bond’s latest outing, Quantum of Solace, will need to take more than £13 million this weekend in Britain if it is to stand a chance of becoming the top-grossing Bond movie.

The Daniel Craig film, which takes its title from an Ian Fleming short story, is being released in Britain first. Sony Pictures, its distributor, will be looking closely at the UK figures as an indicator for its performance globally.

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/b ... 019651.ece
JoniJoni
Posts: 2296
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:00 am

Post by JoniJoni »

Bond box office seen critic and recession-proof

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20081027/med ... oxoffice_1

Very encouraging!
User avatar
bumblebee
Posts: 15193
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: British in USA

Post by bumblebee »

JoniJoni wrote:Bond box office seen critic and recession-proof

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20081027/med ... oxoffice_1

Very encouraging!
Escapism is most welcome in a dire times. I will gladly spend nearly $10 more than once on a ticket to see my man Bond.
advicky
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:37 pm

Post by advicky »

Daniel Craig Interview, Quantum of Solace

Movie Quantum of Solace Posted By: Sheila Roberts

MoviesOnline sat down with British actor Daniel Craig to talk about his new film, “Quantum of Solace,” directed by Mark Forster. Hailed as one of the finest actors of his generation on stage, screen and television, Craig returns to the role of the legendary 007 Agent James Bond following his highly acclaimed debut in Casino Royale, the highest grossing film in the history of the 007 franchise.

Quantum of Solace continues the adventures of James Bond (Craig) in Casino Royale. Betrayed by Vesper, the woman he loved, 007 fights the urge to make his latest mission personal. Pursuing his determination to uncover the truth, Bond and M (Judi Dench) interrogate Mr. White (Jesper Christensen) who reveals the organization which blackmailed Vesper is far more complex and dangerous than anyone had imagined.

Forensic intelligence links an MI6 traitor to a bank account in Haiti where a case of mistaken identity introduces Bond to the beautiful but feisty Camille (Olga Kurylenko), a woman who has her own vendetta. Camille leads Bond straight to Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric), a ruthless businessman and major force within the mysterious organization.

In a minefield of treachery, murder and deceit, Bond allies with old friends in a battle to uncover the truth. As he gets closer to finding the man responsible for the betrayal of Vesper, 007 must keep one step ahead of the CIA, the terrorists and even M, to unravel Greene’s sinister plan and stop ‘Quantum’.

Daniel Craig is a fabulous guy with a wonderful sense of humor. Impeccably dressed in a stylish black suit, he surprises us when he enters the room with his right arm in a matching sling. Here’s what he had to say about his high octane adventures as the legendary James Bond:

Q: I like that it's a black sling, color-coordinated.

Daniel: Well, I had to try. I try to be color-coordinated with all my clothes. What can you do?

Q. So can I ask what happened?

Daniel: No! (laughs) I've had a tear in the shoulder, and I think two Bond movies have just aggravated it and during this one, it started aching really badly halfway through. You know, there was a potential actors’ strike, so we had a deadline. If we didn't finish, we were screwed, so I went to see a surgeon and he just said, “Fine, you might damage it more but you'll be fine and come and see me when you've had a rest.” So six weeks ago I had surgery at Johns Hopkins in Baltimore and I’m well on the way. I've just got to keep it in this (sling) for awhile.

Q. Is Bond chipping away at you piece by piece?

Daniel: No. (laughs)

Q. In this film there seems to be a lot more things to identify you as doing the stunts yourself. Did you feel you did a lot more physically in this?

Daniel: You know, we did, we learned a huge amount when we did Casino Royale, certainly I did, and the stunt team that I worked with did, about how much I can do and what's the limit. I think we're getting better, at just, you know, making it look like it's me. And the guys I work with, I've got four or five guys who work really closely with me, who have got incredible skills, fighting skills, gymnasts, acrobats. And luckily, they're all kind of quite similar to me, and we just… I try to get as fit as they are, because they're seriously fit, and then, you know, I get my face in there and if I can get my face in there in that key moment, and not sort of pull the audience out, that's all I want. I don't want the audience to be watching an action sequence and then suddenly to go, “Oh, it's not him.” And there are moments, if you play it really slowly, you'll be able to find it, but hopefully they're few and far between.

Q. The stunts in this seemed even more dangerous than in Casino Royale, especially all the fire at the end. Was there anything that scared you?

Daniel: No, no, not scared, I mean, trepidation but genuinely it's about getting it right because I only want to do it once. And so if you're standing on a roof and you're going to jump over, I'm like, “I don't want to do this more than once if I can help it.” So, that's all you’ve got going through your head. I mean, there were moments where suddenly we were…because we rehearsed it… so with the fire sequence, we went to a fire testing facility, and we basically went in there with fire suits on and got as close as we could just to sort of get us used to the heat. And then you’re covered in this flame retardant which is like gel, which is just plastered all over your body. At some point I had plastic hands on because I'm smashing through all sort of things, and there's guys with fire extinguishers. You hope for the best. (laughs) No, I mean, there's more to it than that. We would plot it out really, really carefully, and all I cared about when we go for the takes is that we're not doing, you know, the jumping out of windows is actually, I didn't want to do that more than once, but after the third time, it's actually getting quite fun, so (laughs), in a sick way that that happens.

Q. I assume you saw Bond films when you were young. When you became Bond, did you think there's something about this I want to preserve or something about it that should change?

Daniel: Not when I was a child. Mark (Forster) and I had a long conversation when we came to do this, many long conversations, which we're still doing. We're big fans of the early Bonds, but also the movies that they spawned in the 60s, because they had a direct effect on movies all over. One of the biggest things that the early Bond movies did was go on location and that was unusual at the time. I mean if it was Hollywood movies, they were shot in the backlot, and they were created sets and beautifully done, but Bond went, he went to Japan, he was in Japan, and that's what we wanted to make sure happened in this movie, the feel, that you were transported to these places. And plus, trying to add some of the style that they developed back then and trying to get some of that back into the movies and the feel because the mood of them is, they're stylized, I mean, even though there's reality in this and everybody will be saying, oh it's grittier and harder, I think it's a very stylized Bond and I like the fact that it has a look back to that.

Q. I'm imagining that you are going to have a little more pull perhaps with the next Bond film, is there a certain place in the world that you want to go to that you haven't been, that you can work into the Bond franchise?

Daniel: A beach (laughs), for about an hour and 20 minutes in the movie, and then about ten minutes of action. That would really, really thrill me. (laughs) There's a look out and explosions could be happening everywhere, occasionally sipping my cocktail. (laughs)

Q. There are so many amazing places on the planet, is there a place in the world that you would love to...?

Daniel: I mean, the problem always is because travel is so much easier than it has been, there are fewer places to go that people haven't been. What we tried to achieve in this is that we went to places which are unusual to visit and then sort of double like Colon and Panama would double for Haiti and for lots of South America. It's to try and photograph them in the best way you can, and I don't know, there's plenty. I can think of ten places I'd like to go, personally. Ten places to film a Bond movie, that's a different thing, because the logistics of that are so great, but anywhere, you know, anywhere, as long as it's anywhere. If we were in Africa, it would be great. Asia would be wonderful. I'd love to go to China, or Hong Kong. That would be somewhere fantastic.

Q. You talked before about how this movie's a book end to the first movie, but the first BBC review that came out said it felt more like a second in a trilogy. Is it possible that the themes of these first two movies will carry on to the third one, or do you think the third one will be something completely different?

Daniel: Personally I think that we've wrapped up all the loose ends that I wanted to wrap up, which is just the Vespa story and also solidifying the relationships, which is so important, with Felix and with M, and sort of where their place in the world is. I think we've got a very kind of stable Bond world now that we can just do whatever the hell we want, and that I find exciting. To my mind, there's no trilogy because we've got to do something different now. I mean we hit a submarine base. Let's be honest. (laughs) Maybe a small one, you know what I mean? But now we need to explore, you know, there's Moneypenny, there's Q, there's all the other characters that we could conceivably bring in. My instinct has always been with those sort of things, and people have asked and said, “Well why is there no Q? Why is there no Moneypenny?” I'm like, because you need to give them to good actors, and you can't get a good actor and say, “Remember how Moneypenny was played? Can you do that?” I think they'd go, “God, no, I want to reinvent this character.” And so that's what I'd love if we get a chance to make another one of these movies and who knows whatever happens and that's where I'd like to go with it. I'd like to sort of hand it on to some people with talent, that's all.

Q. How did you like working with Mark Forster?

Daniel: It was fun, it was great. I'm a fan of his, I've always been a fan of his, and the idea, when he came up, when he was asked to do it, and I said, I've got absolutely no problem with that, because he's a fantastic storyteller, so.

Q. How was it different from the last Bond film?

Daniel: He's a lover of films, he's a cinefile through and through, and you look at how complex his films are but how different his films are, and to me, that sort of strikes me as a very brave person who can sort of say, you know what, I'm not going to stick with it, you know, I'm going to take subject matters completely at either ends of the spectrum. And when he came to do this I met him and within five minutes, because one of the things I knew having done one, is, this is twice the length of any other movie. It’s three months to normally shoot one movie, I mean a movie of fairly regular size, this is six months, I mean it's six months on every location, and as soon as I met him, I knew he was a brave man and that he was up for doing it, and so I've had a great time with him.

Q. A personal question, when somebody hurts you, can you let it go? Bond cannot let it go, can you?

Daniel: He can, I think he can. I think actually, because the mistake in this movie is that he's on a vendetta, he's not. I kind of keep this whole thing about the title, Quantum of Solace, it's actually what he's looking for, it's all he's looking for. He just does his job. He's not out to take revenge. He might be a little angrier than he was in the first one (laughs), but I mean that's kind of, you know, that's the actual point. The point at the end is he gets the chance to do the guy, the one guy who's actually the person that's responsible, not the bosses, not anyone, the actual guy that twisted the love of his life. And he says no.

Q. I just mean, do you have to get even?

Daniel: No. I don't believe in it, if I can help it, I don't believe in it.

Q. Did you go into this one with more confidence, because obviously with the first one, you know, all the eyes of the world were on you...

Daniel: Kind of. (laughs) Sorry, go on.

Q. ...I know you said back when you were doing press for the first film that you blocked all that out when you went to work, but there's obviously going to be some pressure. The fact that the first one was a success, were you able to start this one with more confidence, and not worry about...

Daniel: I wasn't, I mean, this is going to sound with hindsight like I'm just making this up, but I got over that a long time ago. All of that sort of pressure of doing it was something that happened in the Bahamas about three weeks into the shooting of Casino Royale. We had a good film, I mean we had a good crew, we had good actors, we had a good director, it's like, there's nothing else we can do to make this a better situation, so all the pressure that was on, I'd put to bed, just completely put to bed. By the time we'd got to the premiere in London, people were going, don't you feel vindicated now, and I'm like, I don't feel anything. (laughs) I feel like we've got a great movie. I have no reason to turn around. I never wanted to get into a dialogue about it. So, come to this one, all the same pressures were there, but in a very, very different way. I mean we're on the back of success, which is, I mean thank goodness. We could have been on the back of a dud which would have just been (laughter) I can't imagine. So obviously there's different pressures but there always is. It's a 200 million dollar movie, I don't know how you could do that without thinking there's a little bit of pressure.

Q. Could you talk about the first time they gave you the script? How did they present it to you? Did somebody deliver it to you and what was your reaction the first time you read it? Were you a super fan?

Daniel: You're talking about the script?

Q. Yeah.

Daniel: Was I a superfan? (laughs) No, I mean, it's always, it's a much longer process than that because the whole thing, it took about, I mean I've been working on this for nearly two years now, and so the ideas that we were putting together and the ideas we were putting toward for Paul (Haggis) and the whole thing were coming back and forth, so no one ever presented me with ahhhhh (laughs). I mean it was like I got drafts and I read drafts and we read ideas and we looked at things and it's kind of a continual process. It was not like that with the first one. That was really a kind of, you know, security guards and trying to…no, I’m joking... (laughs), but metaphorically speaking, it was like that, yeah.

Q. So, for you, this was a much more collaborative process?

Daniel: Yeah, very much, yeah.

Q. When you're on set with a film like this, is there a lot of room for any sort of improvisation, or is it really a very structured environment?

Daniel: There's a lot of improv. There's a lot of improv. I mean it's like, I mean obviously, the jumps are not improvised (laughs), “I'll go this way,” you know, “Aahhhh!” (laughter) That would really screw things up, but there's stuff, you know, there's takes and you change lines and I mean, I'm not Robert DeNiro, believe me. I don't kind of go on and on, you know, take after take, but I do do three or four takes and change the lines around and sort of just screw around with it as much as I possibly can. Just to loosen it up, you know?

Q. How was Mark with coverage? Was he a one camera guy or did he have a lot of cameras and a lot of stuff?

Daniel: He likes sticking very classically with one camera, but we'd bring two cameras in, if we could fit it in. You know there's always the thing with two cameras, if you're shooting quickly and you're trying to shoot quickly, is that there's a thing about pushing yourself around the room and the camera kind of starts getting in the eye lines or something if you stick two cameras in, but with dialogue sequences, it's good to shoot it like that sometimes because then you'll get both, you'll get a very continual flow. But, it's not that strict. I mean, I don't know a director that is, that sticks with one camera, unless there's a financial issue involved.

Q. How was it working with Olga?

Daniel: She's great, I mean, you know, we kind of cast her as a… I was involved with the casting process, and she came in and she just had this sort of quiet kind of, I don't know, toughness about her and also something going on, you know, this sort of like secret that she's carrying with her, and you know, she was kind of thrust into this, and we started training and we started sort of getting into it, and sometimes I'm going, this is kind of what it's like (laughter), and she just did a great job and I think that her story kind of ties in so nicely with it and no they don't, they don't get into bed, but they kiss you know. (laughter)

Q. This is an incredible role, but it's also very all consuming because it takes so much of your time now, are you able to do other things that you really want to do?

Daniel: I've done three movies since I did the last one, a little movie called Flashbacks that came out a couple of days ago, kind of very quietly because it's a small movie and then Defiance which is coming out at the end of the year, so I'm just looking at scripts, I mean you know, good scripts are hard to find, you have to go looking for them, so I'll keep doing that if I can.

Q. Have you ever worked with Judy Dench before in London?

Daniel: No...

Q. What is your relationship like working with her?

Daniel: It's good. It's very good, I mean it's a joy to work with her, you know. I mean I'm a very selfish actor. If I can work with really good actors, my job is sliced in half, at the very least sliced in half. I mean she just comes on, she commands, and she could literally speak the phonebook and I'd listen to it.

Q. You mentioned Defiance, which I believe is getting an Academy Award run at the end of the year.

Daniel: It's getting a quick limited release on something like the 31st of December.

Q. Could you talk a little bit about your role in that film and what was it like working with Ed Zwick?

Daniel: Great, Ed sort of presented me the script. It's a story, a very little known story set in Belarus during the second World War about four brothers who organize a resistance really against the German army but also against sort of the local population who are siding with the German army, and there's a forest which is around Belarus, Lithuania which just goes on for miles and miles and miles and it's still impenetrable today. And they went in there, and they sort of committed acts of revenge, and then, formed a society and survived four years and got 1500 people out of the forest, created schools, synagogues, factories, organized with the Russian partisans and it's just a good story. He showed it to me and I said, “Yes, thank you, I'll get involved with that.”

Q. Who do you play?

Daniel: One of the brothers.

Q. With subject matter like that, did you do a lot of research to prepare and was your process a little different?

Daniel: Not really, no. I treat everything just about the same. If there's research to be done, I'll do it, but if there's not research to be done, then you know, I'm off to the pub. (laughs)

Q. What do you think Tom Ford’s suits brought to the look of Bond?

Daniel: He's a very classical modern tailor, you know, I mean I can't talk about tailoring, I don't know a great deal about it, but I know when you put on a good suit, that it feels good. And there was something about the line he created, that I think sort of just, I think it fits with this Bond, I just personally do. And you know, he works in a very classical way, but there's always a twist and it's kind of nice, a nice subtle twist. They’re not kind of flourishes.

Q. And it’s fun to destroy all of them?

Daniel: It's a shame, it's a sadness really. Thank you.

“Quantum of Solace” opens in theaters on November 14th.

http://www.moviesonline.ca/movienews_15816.html
advicky
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:37 pm

Post by advicky »

Brum for Bond in credit crunch

HE is the secret agent who has bashed baddies in Bangkok, the Bahamas and Brazil.
But where next for James Bond in the credit crunch?

Daniel Craig, back as 007 in new film Quantum Of Solace, joked to The Sun last night that if the financial crisis hits Hollywood it could be a case of Bond in BIRMINGHAM.

The actor, 40, says: “There are plenty of places we could shoot in the British Isles.

If the credit crunch hits the movie business, who knows?

“Bond in the Lake District, Liverpool . . . or Birmingham.

“In this film Marc Forster, the director, shot in the Barbican and it looks really great — it looks like the London I know.”

Filming Bond in the UK could limit the chance for Daniel to repeat his iconic Casino Royale swimming trunk saunter from the sea scene — but that is fine by him.

He is uncomfortable being an object of desire for women and admits he only has eyes for his film producer girlfriend Satsuki Mitchell.

He says: “She has everything I truly look for. I really love intelligence. I want beauty and I want goodness — I want it all, basically!

“I also want someone who is going to challenge me. And in return I hope I’m going to challenge them.

“I’m very touched by being called a sex symbol. It’s very nice but I have a sense of humour about it.

“On the one hand it’s very flattering but on the other it doesn’t have much relevance in my life.

“I live with somebody, so all my energy goes into our relationship.

“When I have to take my shirt off for the film I don’t feel particularly comfortable with it.

“Obviously, it’s nice to be fit and in good shape but it’s a by-product of the script — it’s not something where I’m always looking to unbutton my shirt.”

In the Quantum Of Solace — out on Friday — Daniel continues Bond’s reputation as a ladies’ man by getting to grips with gorgeous Gemma Arterton and Olga Kurylenko, who play Agent Fields and Camille respectively.

Fortunately, filming sex scenes doesn’t bother Daniel.

He says: “I’m an actor so I’ve been an exhibitionist for as long as I can remember.

“Those love scenes make the shoot a bit easier.

“But I guess if I stopped to think about them it would probably be quite embarrassing.”

Daniel earned hero status following his first outing as Bond and previews for Quantum Of Solace have been equally well-received.

But the star insists he would never compare himself to Our Boys and Girls fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Quantum Of Solace’s London premiere tomorrow night is in aid of The Sun-backed Help For Heroes campaign and The Royal British Legion — two charities which help injured soldiers and their families.

Princes William and Harry — who have both served in the Forces — are attending the screening.

Daniel says: “Playing a hero doesn’t compare to the heroics of our soldiers.

“Obviously, I would never be so arrogant as to compare myself to them. It’s great that we can make this gesture with the premiere and support the young men and women who have been injured and who are putting their necks on the line for us at the moment. Forgetting that would be awful.”

Despite his humility, Daniel had a tough time filming the latest Bond instalment. Quantum Of Solace has twice as many stunts as Casino Royale and it has taken its toll on the film’s lead.

The actor, with his right arm in a sling, says: “It’s been a whole new set of injuries on this one.

“I had so many pulled muscles and things like that.

“I’ve been even more physically involved in every aspect of this film.

“On Casino Royale, I pulled my Achilles tendon and was limping around and was in pain a lot of the time.

“This time I managed to slice the end off a finger in a fight sequence. I guess accidents are bound to happen. We’ve certainly not held back, that’s for bloody sure.”

When it was announced Daniel was replacing Pierce Brosnan as 007, many feared he was too serious to capture the cheeky self-confidence of Bond.

But while he has appeared in a number of hard-hitting movies, Daniel claims he is guilty of not taking things seriously enough.

With a wry smile, he says: “I tend to giggle a lot, probably way too much, and I tend to get in trouble for it. I guess that’s not very Bond-like.

“When we are on set we try to keep things as light and as easygoing as possible. Everyone is away from home and missing their loved ones and friends. It’s important to keep things fresh.

“Dame Judi Dench, who plays M, likes to tell jokes — but I wouldn’t like to embarrass her by repeating them.”

Despite his success as the secret agent, many fans have been disappointed by the absence of old Bond favourites in Daniel’s films, such as secretary Miss Moneypenny and gadget expert Q.

But the good news is that Daniel — who has had a large say on the scripts in his two Bond ventures — is keen to see them return.

He admits: “I think we can introduce Moneypenny and Q back into their roles. We have got to offer them to the best actors possible.

“I also think there’s a place for submarine bases — that’s the way forward for me.”

With two movies under his belt Daniel could be forgiven for assuming the 007 licence to kill is his until he decides to give it up.

But he believes he cannot take the role for granted and that his dream job could be taken away from him.

He says: “I’m only borrowing the character. I think someone will come along and do a better job than me.

“Bond belongs to Ian Fleming and producer Barbara Broccoli.

“I would love to do another one. Maybe I’m just pessimistic but I’ll see how it goes.”

With Quantum Of Solace set to match the box office success of Casino Royale, Daniel is hoping there is more glory on the way — for his beloved football team Liverpool.

He was delighted that the Reds ended title rivals Chelsea’s 86-match unbeaten home record with a 1-0 win on Sunday.

And while he feels there is another actor waiting to step into Bond’s shoes, there is one man he does think is truly irreplaceable — Liverpool striker Fernando Torres.

Daniel says: “I think there is a pretty good chance that Liverpool can win the league. Get Torres back and we will be pretty unbeatable.”


http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sh ... 863330.ece
advicky
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:37 pm

Post by advicky »

Expect a 'minimalistic' 007

Image
Audiences should expect "a very minimalistic bond" when Quantum Of Solace hits cinema screens.
Speaking at the Hollywood Film Festival's awards gala in Beverly Hills, Paul Haggis - one of the movies writers - was keeping as tight-lipped as 007 himself when it came to dishing out details of what we can expect from the 22nd instalment.

He did however say fans won't be disappointed. "I think if you liked Casino Royale it's more of the same but the director Mark Forester put his own stamp on this," he said.

"It's a very minimalistic bond," he added mysteriously.

Paul admitted that Daniel Craig had really earned his stripes as the new Bond.

"Yes absolutely, its obvious isn't it, he's terrific," he said.

But the award-winning filmmaker admits he hasn't always been a fan of the franchise.

"I loved the early Bonds and then just fell out of watching them in the Roger Moore days. Not that I didn't like Roger Moore, it just became very fantastical. But I jumped at the chance to work on Casino Royale," he said.

As for Paul's favourite Bond Girl, well he's sticking with his last 007 hit: "Eva Green I think, well she did my movie - there you go."

http://www.metro.co.uk/fame/article.htm ... _a_source=
Daskedusken
Posts: 14137
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:14 pm
Location: Always heading somewhere

Post by Daskedusken »

The current James Bond `relishes killing`, professor claims
Quantum Of Solace - 28-10-08

A film studies professor has claimed that audiences for Quantum of Solace will see a James Bond markedly different to that created by Ian Fleming, reports InTheNews.

While Daniel Craig's portrayal of the character is close to that of Fleming's books in his lack of one-liners, the cold-blooded approach to violence seen in Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace is unlike that of the novels, according to Professor James Chapman, of the University of Leicester's department of history of art and film.

"Craig is obviously a lot more physical, even brutish, than previous Bond actors," he explains in an article published for the university's online magazine.

"He plays Bond as a 'blunt instrument': he's not yet the polished article, he's still rough around the edges.

"Craig's Bond doesn't do the one-liners that others have done. In that respect - but that respect only - he's closer to the Bond of the books, who doesn't crack jokes and is a rather humourless character," he continued.

"But in other respects Craig's Bond is very unlike Fleming's Bond. Fleming's Bond did not enjoy killing; Craig's Bond seems almost to relish it."

Professor James Chapman also claims that in Casino Royale Bond's body was presented as much as an erotic object as the women's bodies with gratuitous shots of Craig in his swimming trunks.

"Fleming's Bond is not particularly presented as a sexual object: the emphasis in the books is very much on male desire rather than female desire, with the sole exception of The Spy Who Loved Me, in which Fleming experimented with writing from the perspective of a woman who encounters James Bond," he explained.

Professor Chapman's book Licence To Thrill: A Cultural History of the James Bond Films is out now.

http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?ite ... mi6&s=news
"Love anyway. Live anyway. Choose to part of this anyway”
Daskedusken
Posts: 14137
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:14 pm
Location: Always heading somewhere

Post by Daskedusken »

`I am very happy with the result` - Daniel Craig on Quantum of Solace
Quantum Of Solace - 28-10-08

Daniel Craig may be a man of many talents, but he also has the power of prophecy - reports the BBC

Click here to watch the video interview online.

"I'm going to get hurt," he said at the press launch for Quantum of Solace in January - just after filming on his second outing as 007 had commenced.

And here's Craig nine months later with his right arm in a sling after a shoulder operation, having also severed his fingertip and had eight stitches in his face after being accidentally kicked by one of his co-stars.

The actor proffers his left arm for a solid - if slightly awkward - handshake and, despite all those injuries, is in an ebullient mood about the new film.

"I'm very happy with the result and director Marc Forster's done an amazing job, so I couldn't be happier at the moment," Craig says, his eyes every as bit as blue in real life as they are on the big screen.

The first reviews have been largely positive and critics and fans are starting to openly declare Craig to be the best Bond of them all.

Not least because he has helped reinvent Bond as a cruel and emotionally battered character who is far closer to the superspy of Ian Fleming's novels.

"The character's rounded and 90% of his views I can't go along with," says Craig.

"But he falls in love and falls out of love, he struggles with his work, and to get some of those in the movie is just the job. I don't know another way of doing it - I look to the Flemings for help."

Quantum of Solace is the shortest Bond movie to date, but packs in more locations than ever before.

Filming began in January at Pinewood Studios in the UK before moving on to Panama, Chile's Atacama desert, various locations in Italy including Siena and Lake Garda, plus Bregenz in Austria and San Felipe, Mexico.

The workload, says Craig, was tougher than it was on Casino Royale.

"There was a potential actors' strike in June or July and because we'd started we had to finish on a certain date, so the pressure was on - we couldn't stop. If I'd got an injury and we'd had to stop for a couple of weeks it would have really screwed things around. "

So how much creative input does Craig have in the production process?

"I don't shut up!" he laughs. "I can't give you a percentage. I try and involve myself with everything - but I don't interfere. Marc's the director and it's important that his vision of the movie comes across very strongly.

"We sat in meetings months before we started shooting and talked about what we wanted. So I'm as involved as much as I can be."

Both of Craig's Bond movies have ditched the gadgets, the glib one-liners, Miss Moneypenny and Q . Bond doesn't even sleep with his feisty sidekick Camille (Olga Kurylenko).

But Craig is adamant that the likes of Moneypenny and Q have not been consigned to Bond history.

"No, not at all," he says. "We certainly have to introduce them and earn the right to have them. You can't just drop them in. There's a generation of people who don't know Bond movies and I want them to watch the movies and understand who those characters are."

So how does Daniel Craig - the actor - detach himself from the world of James Bond and keep his feet on the ground?

"By getting away from it as much as possible," says Craig decisively.

"And where do you go?"

"Well I'm not going to tell you, am I?" says Craig with an icy blue warning flash of those piercing eyes. Then he breaks into laughter.

"No, I spend time with my friends and my family the people that matter to me."

And then it's time for a final left-handed shake, before Craig heads off on another assignment with a member of the press.

http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?ite ... mi6&s=news
"Love anyway. Live anyway. Choose to part of this anyway”
Daskedusken
Posts: 14137
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:14 pm
Location: Always heading somewhere

Post by Daskedusken »

Bond Conquers The Chinese Censors

'Quantum of Solace' approved with no cuts made

Written by Devin Zydel on 28 Oct, 2008

James Bond has conquered the Chinese censors once again.

Following the recent news that Quantum of Solace had been scheduled for a 5 November premiere in China, Variety reports that the film has been passed with no cuts made.

As 007 fans will recall, Daniel Craig’s first Bond adventure, Casino Royale was the first Bond film ever played at Chinese theatres, after being forbidden for so many years. The film—which was also approved with no cuts—went on to become a strong success at the country’s box office.

Sony’s Li Chow said the plan for were hoping to get Quantum of Solace on at least 1,000 screens across China, including both 35mm and digital. ‘We hope it will do well and can run until December, maybe Christmas,’ he said.

Gala premieres for the Bond film are being planned for Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou.

http://commanderbond.net/article/5703
"Love anyway. Live anyway. Choose to part of this anyway”
advicky
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:37 pm

Post by advicky »

New Bond film holds much promise

If the early buzz holds good, the 22nd James Bond [Images] film, Quantum Of Solace, could become the biggest money-making Bond film ever when it releases on November 7.

Hollywood insiders expect the film to out-gross the previous Bond adventure Casino Royale, which grossed nearly $600 million worldwide. That would make Daniel Craig's [Images] second Bond film the third most successful film of the year, following The Dark Knight [Images] ($993 million and counting) and Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of Crystal Skull ($780 million).

The new Bond film carries certain amount of emotional weight too, in addition to car chases and other adrenaline pumping adventures. It offers a story of grieving Bond, who sets out to avenge the murder of his beloved Vesper Lynd. In a sense, the new Bond adventure is a sequel to Casino Royale.

The worldwide arrival of the Bond film, which will be released in North America a week after its Indian debut, adds plenty of excitement to the box office season. This week, High School Musical 3: Senior Year grossed an estimated $82 million worldwide in just three days. It was number one in North America and in the international circuit becoming the first worldwide chart-topper since the Batman sequel The Dark Knight in July, producer Disney said. The fact that it is yet to open in many territories outside North America shows that it will be a major player for quite some time.

The High School Musical films have given a very high profile to its young stars Zac Efron, Vanessa Hudgens and Ashley Tisdale. The latest film is set in a fictional New Mexico high school, where Troy (Efron) is torn between a basketball scholarship and his song-and-dance dreams.

Though the Disney film may not have the strength to match the grand success of Mamma Mia [Images]!, which has grossed $550 million worldwide and still has some life left, the teenage romantic musical is nevertheless on its way to become one of the biggest hits of the year. Hollywood insiders expect it to gross at least $300 million worldwide. Unlike Quantum Of Solace and The Dark Knight, the former costing $200 million and latter $20 million less, the new musical was made for about $12 million. Mamma Mia! cost about $65 million.

In the Halloween season, the musical far outgrossed Saw V, which nevertheless opened to a strong $30 million. But while the gorefest will not be spilling blood beyond three or four weeks, the musical could be dancing among the top 10 films of the week for a longer time.

The new James Bond adventure could also set a record. In America, where the Bond films are hits but not spectacularly successful, Quantum of Solace could become the first film in the franchise to cross the $200 million mark. Casino Royale, released two years ago, grossed $167 million in North America.

Quantum Of Solace is getting plenty of respect from the trade publications Variety and Screen International. It is the thinking man's Bond, declared Variety, pointing out that Marc Forster -- known for his smaller movies such as Finding Neverland and Monster's Ball -- has deftly directed Quantum Of Solace. Forster has not forgotten the action and chase parts of the franchise, the influential trade publication said, but he has also given the film 'arty, tasteful and elegant' look.'

'The film's most ambitious set-piece, a lyrical homage to Alfred Hitchcock's The Man Who Knew Too Much, unfolds on the floating stage of a Bregenz Festival Opera House performance of Tosca,' Variety reported.

Forster, who was born in Germany [Images] and was raised in Switzerland [Images], divides his time between America and Switzerland. This is the first action film he has directed but he has confessed he saw a James Bond movie for the first time when he was offered the Bond film. He added that he was never daunted by the prospect of making a high tech film. His last released film The Kite Runner, based on Khaled Hosseini's bestseller, was made for just about $20 million. And yet the heart-piercing film went on to earn not only good reviews but also a solid $80 million worldwide.

When Forster was approached by Sony to make the Bond film, he was initially not enthusiastic. But his colleagues including his film editor and set designer pushed him into doing the film. The final part of the persuasion came when Sony honchos told Forster, according to newspaper reports, that they wanted him to take the Bond franchise 'a step further.'

And it shows on the screen, the trade publications say.

'Blue eyes on fire and jaw set to resolute, Daniel Craig clearly owns Bond in Quantum Of Solace: but it's the relentless pace, the quality of art direction and production design -- in fact, director Marc Forster's sheer technical ambition -- which raise the bar and make this one of the most remarkable action films ever made,' declared Screen International. 'Bond fans may hanker after his gadgets or some of the camp which Craig & co have so firmly extracted from the role, Casino Royale converts might, justifiably, wish for a stronger story, but one thing is certain: as an action film, this will be a tough act to follow.'

Given Forster's reputation for making quirky films with unexpected twists that have appealed to the hip and younger audiences, the new Bond film could win the intrepid spy a new generation of fans.

http://inhome.rediff.com/movies/2008/oct/29bond.htm

I'm happy that I'll contribute to this box office success. I'll go to see this movie plus I'll take my brother and my sister-in-law with me. Plus I'll buy the QoS DVD. I do everything that Mr. Craig will get more share.
Post Reply