I tend to concur. He has been consistently looking a little less like his usual self lately, dare I say it, a bit rough. not just this one time!Germangirl wrote:He surely isn't giving hmself good advertise. For me, this look is due to his life style right now and not due to the heavy work load. He should think about it - not doing him any good. He has worked so hard to get where he is, but right now, he seems to throw it all out. IF he is in good spirits - one reason less to get blasted way too often. Time to get a grip on life again, man. And I mean that with lots of love in my heart.Sylvia's girl wrote:Not surprised the tabloids have got hold og these
Late night, Daniel? Bond star Craig looked tired and bleary-eyed as he jetted out of Los Angeles
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... z1DxEd1uaF
Paparazzi Pics
Moderator: Germangirl
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47069
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
I am not talking about being wellgroomed. The question is, WILL he be able to look like a million bucks any time soon? He didn't for quite a while and I am talking months. So - something should change. He needs a grip on life again, he has lost it pretty much IMO. Just for info - I am pro Sats and I am pro Rachel - just don't like the circumstances of this new relatuionsship. Pics prove, he doesn't adjust well - like I thought. he needs constant company...time will tell though. I am sureley hoping for the best and being a Dan girl first and foremost, I don't give a damn, WHO is doing him any good.caramel wrote:But honestly why would he care about being well groomed to walk thru the airport to catch the red-eye.Germangirl wrote:He surely isn't giving hmself good advertise. For me, this look is due to his life style right now and not due to the heavy work load. He should think about it - not doing him any good. He has worked so hard to get where he is, but right now, he seems to throw it all out. IF he is in good spirits - one reason less to get blasted way too often. Time to get a grip on life again, man. And I mean that with lots of love in my heart.Sylvia's girl wrote:Not surprised the tabloids have got hold og these
Late night, Daniel? Bond star Craig looked tired and bleary-eyed as he jetted out of Los Angeles
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... z1DxEd1uaF
He'll look like a million bucks during the promos for his movie and that's what counts. We know he will deliver with panache when it is imp. Otherwise he is fine going about his day looking comfortable.
Maybe not many people scrutinize him like we do
The top notch acting in the Weisz/Craig/Spall 'Betrayal' is emotionally true, often v funny and its beautifully staged with filmic qualities..
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47069
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
Oh, he isn't finished, by now means, but he is not the age anymore, where he can rock the bars consistantly and be on top of his game as well. not working...he will be sexy for the rest of his life, but he should start thinking twice, before he goes on the roll again...hey, I love him and am only concernedbubita_11 wrote:A man looking vulnerable doesn´t mean he´s finished , and he´s still sexy as hell!
The top notch acting in the Weisz/Craig/Spall 'Betrayal' is emotionally true, often v funny and its beautifully staged with filmic qualities..
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47069
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47069
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
Probably its just you, because the more self assured a man is, the more he can show without hesitating - like DC did -, that he just LOVES to have someone at his side or is even in need of a person. He has no PROBLEM with that. He doeasn't NEED to prove anything to anybody.caramel wrote:Honestly I don't believe the man is as 'needy' as he is made out to be.
He is a big boy with a grown up daughter - he can take care of himself. Anyway to me seeing him without someone constantly by his side only makes him look that much more self-assured. may be that's me.
I do think - and I am not judging that - you wouldn't complain, if we we talking about Rachel at his side. Its ok to be not a "Sats woman", but that shouldn't take away the fair fact, that he was VERY well backed up by her and looked much better for most of the time, then he does right now - for some time. Mind you, its not Rachels fault - if anything, its the fault of the circumstances, that I don't think, can be changed. HE has to adjust to that better, IF he wants to BE with her. My two...
The top notch acting in the Weisz/Craig/Spall 'Betrayal' is emotionally true, often v funny and its beautifully staged with filmic qualities..
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47069
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
However blastered he might be - he still manages to queue them up just by smiling. I posted one of the smiling pics from LAX and this is the result:
Daniel Craig
DC at LAX airport on sunday
vor 5 hour over tumblr ·
*
Dir, Beks Jones ヅ und 313 anderen gefällt das.
The comments so far:
http://www.facebook.com/Daniel.Craig.FanPage?ref=nf#
Daniel Craig
DC at LAX airport on sunday
vor 5 hour over tumblr ·
*
Dir, Beks Jones ヅ und 313 anderen gefällt das.
The comments so far:
http://www.facebook.com/Daniel.Craig.FanPage?ref=nf#
The top notch acting in the Weisz/Craig/Spall 'Betrayal' is emotionally true, often v funny and its beautifully staged with filmic qualities..
Thanks so much D_CDaniel_Craig wrote:THX for the new pics, trueblue!
This is so hard that you have to move out the shoes at the security checkpoint at U.S. airports even . 9/11 salute...$abbatha wrote:But why he took off his shoes?trueblue wrote:
Regarding Craig,people he needs only to find the balance,it's up to him,but even if he looks battered there's nothing wrong,he changed a lot of things into his very own private life,it's normal,even logical,that he must find a new balance.
Nothing to worry about,imo.
He he he sorry people..but i flight only to UK few times but was a loooong time ago..someone could even faint if i took off my sneakers for security check..no kidding..sometimes my sneakers are my slippers...BondBabe2008 wrote:Yep I had to do that when I was flying to the USA, under very strict security reasons, you should know that $abDunda wrote:You have to at the security check...$abbatha wrote: But why he took off his shoes?
At least the last times I took a plane ....
I never said he has to prove anything to anybody. The bottom line is none of us here know him, what makes him tick or what he needs.Germangirl wrote:Probably its just you, because the more self assured a man is, the more he can show without hesitating - like DC did -, that he just LOVES to have someone at his side or is even in need of a person. He has no PROBLEM with that. He doeasn't NEED to prove anything to anybody.caramel wrote:Honestly I don't believe the man is as 'needy' as he is made out to be.
He is a big boy with a grown up daughter - he can take care of himself. Anyway to me seeing him without someone constantly by his side only makes him look that much more self-assured. may be that's me.
I do think - and I am not judging that - you wouldn't complain, if we we talking about Rachel at his side. Its ok to be not a "Sats woman", but that shouldn't take away the fair fact, that he was VERY well backed up by her and looked much better for most of the time, then he does right now - for some time. Mind you, its not Rachels fault - if anything, its the fault of the circumstances, that I don't think, can be changed. HE has to adjust to that better, IF he wants to BE with her. My two...
About the Sats/Rachel thing - You could be right! I would be lying if I said otherwise But looking at their life right now, it doesn't look like she will be by his side ALL the time and that's absolutely fine with me.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47069
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
Hey, we don't NEED a peace sign, we are not at war. We must learn - absolutely again here - to disagree and still feel comfortable in doing so. Its fine, no problem.caramel wrote:I never said he has to prove anything to anybody. The bottom line is none of us here know him, what makes him tick or what he needs.Germangirl wrote:Probably its just you, because the more self assured a man is, the more he can show without hesitating - like DC did -, that he just LOVES to have someone at his side or is even in need of a person. He has no PROBLEM with that. He doeasn't NEED to prove anything to anybody.caramel wrote:Honestly I don't believe the man is as 'needy' as he is made out to be.
He is a big boy with a grown up daughter - he can take care of himself. Anyway to me seeing him without someone constantly by his side only makes him look that much more self-assured. may be that's me.
I do think - and I am not judging that - you wouldn't complain, if we we talking about Rachel at his side. Its ok to be not a "Sats woman", but that shouldn't take away the fair fact, that he was VERY well backed up by her and looked much better for most of the time, then he does right now - for some time. Mind you, its not Rachels fault - if anything, its the fault of the circumstances, that I don't think, can be changed. HE has to adjust to that better, IF he wants to BE with her. My two...
About the Sats/Rachel thing - You could be right! I would be lying if I said otherwise But looking at their life right now, it doesn't look like she will be by his side ALL the time and that's absolutely fine with me.
Yes, with you, but I doubt, its working for him - RIGHT NOW. Maybe he gets used to it in the future. Hopefully - we will see.But looking at their life right now, it doesn't look like she will be by his side ALL the time and that's absolutely fine with me.
The top notch acting in the Weisz/Craig/Spall 'Betrayal' is emotionally true, often v funny and its beautifully staged with filmic qualities..