Very well put, GG. I just LOVE when people feel compelled to tell others what they should or shouldn't do as if it was any of their business.Germangirl wrote:Yeah, she is a terrible woman. Just so selfish and destroying his life and career. Ashes on her. And we can see, how he suffers in every bit we get from him. A deeply unhappy man, who clearly wishes, he had never married her. Tragic.tampa wrote: Her thing should have been to be there supporting a charity that is important to him and that he gives a lot of money to. She also didn't show for the Gypsy AIDS event, also very important to NY theater and charity orgs, nor the ICAP event. She's got nannies and household help. And she's not sick as she is doing the play. Not good form.
Artists for Peace & Justice NYC Holiday Benefit
Moderator: Germangirl
This!!!!! Multiple thumbs up for your wise words!Germangirl wrote:Yeah, she is a terrible woman. Just so selfish and destroying his life and career. Ashes on her. And we can see, how he suffers in every bit we get from him. A deeply unhappy man, who clearly wishes, he had never married her. Tragic.tampa wrote: Her thing should have been to be there supporting a charity that is important to him and that he gives a lot of money to. She also didn't show for the Gypsy AIDS event, also very important to NY theater and charity orgs, nor the ICAP event. She's got nannies and household help. And she's not sick as she is doing the play. Not good form.
Now, now. Each of us are allowed to express our own values and opinions. Perhaps she was just PMS'ing. I know that's the last place I'd rather be after a day's work on the stage, plus cramps and zits! Whatever, she's no Sats and interestingly un-clingy. I take his appearance here as a professional one, therefore no wifey required to drag along.Hannah wrote:This!!!!! Multiple thumbs up for your wise words!Germangirl wrote:Yeah, she is a terrible woman. Just so selfish and destroying his life and career. Ashes on her. And we can see, how he suffers in every bit we get from him. A deeply unhappy man, who clearly wishes, he had never married her. Tragic.tampa wrote: Her thing should have been to be there supporting a charity that is important to him and that he gives a lot of money to. She also didn't show for the Gypsy AIDS event, also very important to NY theater and charity orgs, nor the ICAP event. She's got nannies and household help. And she's not sick as she is doing the play. Not good form.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47073
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
Opinion, yes, sure. But always only showing up for the sole purpose of spreadi.g negativity, is not wbat I would call and respect as opinion anymore. And hating on the women was always something I strongly disliked. But, of course, this is also just an opinjon - mine.
The top notch acting in the Weisz/Craig/Spall 'Betrayal' is emotionally true, often v funny and its beautifully staged with filmic qualities..
Omg, how could anyone hate on Rachel???!!! And agreed, these are professional events, not someone's dinner party. They seem to just go out of their way to not 'appear' as a celeb couple. They want no part of a train wreck moniker like Danchel. They come out of the theater separately and leave in separate cars. They were interviewed separately before the play. Interesting that not one celeb rag mag has run off with the story that their marriage is in trouble - not! I believe it's because that's probably as far from reality as possible. You gotta hand it to them. They are in as much control of their 'celebrity' as possible.
And sorry, I just have to speak to the hair. I lustfully love it. Just check out the gorgeous layered wave in that side shot. Sexy. Double sexy. And those lashes in the interview - to die for.
Oh, and no hate posting on Sats was allowed when she was around. I see no reason why the house rules should change for Rachel, especially since she's the one he's in love with.
And sorry, I just have to speak to the hair. I lustfully love it. Just check out the gorgeous layered wave in that side shot. Sexy. Double sexy. And those lashes in the interview - to die for.
Oh, and no hate posting on Sats was allowed when she was around. I see no reason why the house rules should change for Rachel, especially since she's the one he's in love with.
All good! The show has been picked up for the back nine and I have six weeks off! Dream job! Rosie and I are fat sassy and living la dolce vita--All's that missing is the cabana boy! Pumas rule! ksf2la wrote:It's K!!!!!!! How are you??? How's the job going? Rosie?khenton wrote:Thanks ladies for the first real giggle I've had all day. You da bombs dc dames!!!
Damn. No future with Daniel Craig.
Fourwordsbeforesex "Hello, I'm Daniel Craig."
Fourwordsbeforesex "Hello, I'm Daniel Craig."
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47073
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
Hey K. great to see you and to hear, all is well. Pop up once in a while and tell us, how you are. Just because you are surfing in other waters, it doesn't mean, we wanna loose you alltogether.
The top notch acting in the Weisz/Craig/Spall 'Betrayal' is emotionally true, often v funny and its beautifully staged with filmic qualities..
- CockHargreaves
- Posts: 1932
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:20 pm
- Location: UK
Well said, GG.Alina wrote:Very well put, GG. I just LOVE when people feel compelled to tell others what they should or shouldn't do as if it was any of their business.Germangirl wrote:Yeah, she is a terrible woman. Just so selfish and destroying his life and career. Ashes on her. And we can see, how he suffers in every bit we get from him. A deeply unhappy man, who clearly wishes, he had never married her. Tragic.tampa wrote: Her thing should have been to be there supporting a charity that is important to him and that he gives a lot of money to. She also didn't show for the Gypsy AIDS event, also very important to NY theater and charity orgs, nor the ICAP event. She's got nannies and household help. And she's not sick as she is doing the play. Not good form.
Maybe we should remember that not all mothers want to give all the responsibility to the nanny, but want to be with their child as much as possible. I also agree with the idea that they don't want to be out and about as a celebrity couple. I certainly don't perceive Rachel as not supporting Daniel in a personal or professional way. And yes, he looks like a very happy man these days, hair notwithstanding
- CockHargreaves
- Posts: 1932
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:20 pm
- Location: UK
-
- Posts: 11961
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:57 am
BOVET 1822 Partners With Artists For Peace And Justice For Children In Haiti‏
Read more: http://www.looktothestars.org/news/1130 ... z2oPEoO1PX
Follow us: @looktothestars on Twitter | looktothestarsorg on Facebook
Read more: http://www.looktothestars.org/news/1130 ... z2oPEoO1PX
Follow us: @looktothestars on Twitter | looktothestarsorg on Facebook
^ Thanks, SG! So this could be the pocket watch that the Bovet guy was showing Daniel. But why did he leave it at his table?
http://www.bovet.com/
http://www.bovet.com/