News tidbits

Firstsupergirl · Post by **Firstsupergirl** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 7:38 am

Germangirl wrote:
Lu wrote:
Faustine wrote: Already did they want to be they a pretty accessory not? Anyway, before this commentary was obvious that they were speaking his lust and not his good taste.

This suit is horrible, big, the pants too long. Daniel cannot move with a suit with a minimal elegance, this hand deforming the pants... If there is a moment in which there is obvious the coarse man that is ... is when he´s in suit and in movement

yes, he is a coarse lovely animal in a suit.
I like the relaxed way he is wearing that suit and if ever there is something right about him, its his movements - they are never anything but elegant - may it be walking or standing or whatnot - IMO. ...but yes, his hands ARE deforming the pants

I'm soooo with you, GG!

agrippina · Post by **agrippina** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:39 am

If he endorses LV, will that mean that he has to abandon the Trusted Brown Leather Travel Bag?

Grip (concerned)

redluna · Post by **redluna** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:43 am

agrippina wrote:If he endorses LV, will that mean that he has to abandon the Trusted Brown Leather Travel Bag?

Grip (concerned)

Hopefully not!!!

Ang · Post by **Ang** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:37 am

redluna wrote:
agrippina wrote:If he endorses LV, will that mean that he has to abandon the Trusted Brown Leather Travel Bag?

Grip (concerned)
Hopefully not!!!

Yeah, I hate Lous Vuitton bags, they look crass! Now Mulberry.....

Germangirl · Post by **Germangirl** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:11 pm

I feel they are not overly fitting for men

and also, I find it hard to believe, that he will do commercial stuff like that. Time will tell...

Faustine · Post by **Faustine** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:03 pm

Firstsupergirl wrote:
Germangirl wrote:
Lu wrote:
yes, he is a coarse lovely animal in a suit.
I like the relaxed way he is wearing that suit and if ever there is something right about him, its his movements - they are never anything but elegant - may it be walking or standing or whatnot - IMO. ...but yes, his hands ARE deforming the pants
I'm soooo with you, GG!

relaxed..... in suit.... in public...... Great joke GG

Lu:

Absolutely lovely coarse animal. We love this in Daniel not???? Elegance.....

Lu · Post by Lu » Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:05 pm

Faustine wrote:
Firstsupergirl wrote:
Germangirl wrote: I like the relaxed way he is wearing that suit and if ever there is something right about him, its his movements - they are never anything but elegant - may it be walking or standing or whatnot - IMO. ...but yes, his hands ARE deforming the pants
I'm soooo with you, GG!
relaxed..... in suit.... in public...... Great joke GG

Lu: Absolutely lovely coarse animal. We love this in Daniel not???? Elegance.....

Yes, Faustine, we do

But the most enthralling thing about Daniel to me is that he disguises this coarseness so well in elegance.

Have I not always said the only thing his suits make me want to do is rip them off? It excites me, this talent of his, to be both coarse f***able man and elegant gentleman at the same time (just like in my avatar.)

Germangirl · Post by **Germangirl** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 6:53 pm

Faustine wrote: relaxed..... in suit.... in public...... Great joke GG

How about some respect for a change, Faustine? Not that I care, if you laugh at me/my comments, but I think it will suit this board better, when ALL are following that unwritten rule. Thank you.

Faustine · Post by **Faustine** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 1:11 am

Germangirl wrote:
Faustine wrote: relaxed..... in suit.... in public...... Great joke GG
How about some respect for a change, Faustine? Not that I care, if you laugh at me/my comments, but I think it will suit this board better, when ALL are following that unwritten rule. Thank you.

I will not return to commit the same mistake twice. I will answer this for pm, sorry but this is private.

Only I will repeat an request to all: if someone has problems with my way of writing or my humor, or I hurt of some way. SPEAK. Write in the forum, writes to my mail but don´t be kept silent.

The only public negative reception is GG, publicly they all encourage me to which continues writing in the same way. Thank you

Faustine · Post by **Faustine** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 1:38 am

Lu wrote:
Faustine wrote:
Firstsupergirl wrote: I'm soooo with you, GG!
relaxed..... in suit.... in public...... Great joke GG

Lu: Absolutely lovely coarse animal. We love this in Daniel not???? Elegance.....
Yes, Faustine, we do

But the most enthralling thing about Daniel to me is that he disguises this coarseness so well in elegance.

Have I not always said the only thing his suits make me want to do is rip them off? It excites me, this talent of his, to be both coarse f***able man and elegant gentleman at the same time (just like in my avatar.)

Elegant gentleman? This it´s the Daniel that I don´t see. I see an attempt of being elegant obviously and often too reasoned. Where do I see it? When he´s in events. Your avatar, the Superfirstgirl´s siggy they are photoshoots.

What I try to say is that I don´t see natural elegance in him and don´t not search it at all.

Pierce Brosnan, George Clooney, Clive Owen, Hugh Jackman are elegant it is not important what clothes they take. Today I saw Brosnan's movie: Great Owl, he that takes a few long braids and there was hurting the handsome man that was.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0128239/

But Daniel, Gerry Butler, Ewan Mc Gregor, Thomas Krestchman with this jewelery that they use are the opposite thing: not matter what they dress they are not elegant. They are sexy, virile, gorgeous up to the pain but not elegant.

Always I speak about actors that I like very much.

Since I have commented on it before with you, Daniel is brutally virile, the rest is marketing and I´m not interested in consuming this part of he.

Post by **Elaine_Figgis** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 2:24 am

Faustine wrote:
Germangirl wrote:
Faustine wrote: relaxed..... in suit.... in public...... Great joke GG
How about some respect for a change, Faustine? Not that I care, if you laugh at me/my comments, but I think it will suit this board better, when ALL are following that unwritten rule. Thank you.
I will not return to commit the same mistake twice. I will answer this for pm, sorry but this is private.

Only I will repeat an request to all: if someone has problems with my way of writing or my humor, or I hurt of some way. SPEAK. Write in the forum, writes to my mail but don´t be kept silent.

The only public negative reception is GG, publicly they all encourage me to which continues writing in the same way. Thank you

I don't know who 'they' are that are encouraging you, but GG is not the only one concerned about your language and how you choose state your opinions. I for one, had decided some time ago not to engage you in conversation based on your negative statements, I've chosen to ignore them. I don't wish my every visit here to be an argument. If I wanted negative, I'd go to JustJared. But this comment and conversation has forced my hand.

You say you don't wish to make the same mistake twice and that it's private, but I really don't think that's the truth. You like being provocative and a provocateur.

Faustine · Post by **Faustine** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 2:34 am

Elaine_Figgis wrote:
Faustine wrote:
Germangirl wrote: How about some respect for a change, Faustine? Not that I care, if you laugh at me/my comments, but I think it will suit this board better, when ALL are following that unwritten rule. Thank you.
I will not return to commit the same mistake twice. I will answer this for pm, sorry but this is private.

Only I will repeat an request to all: if someone has problems with my way of writing or my humor, or I hurt of some way. SPEAK. Write in the forum, writes to my mail but don´t be kept silent.

The only public negative reception is GG, publicly they all encourage me to which continues writing in the same way. Thank you
I don't know who 'they' are that are encouraging you, but GG is not the only one concerned about your language and how you choose state your opinions. I for one, had decided some time ago not to engage you in conversation based on your negative statements, I've chosen to ignore them. I don't wish my every visit here to be an argument. If I wanted negative, I'd go to JustJared. But this comment and conversation has forced my hand.

You say you don't wish to make the same mistake twice and that it's private, but I really don't think that's the truth. You like being provocative and a provocateur.

Thanks for your honesty

Firstsupergirl · Post by **Firstsupergirl** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:13 am

Elaine_Figgis wrote:
Faustine wrote:
Germangirl wrote: How about some respect for a change, Faustine? Not that I care, if you laugh at me/my comments, but I think it will suit this board better, when ALL are following that unwritten rule. Thank you.
I will not return to commit the same mistake twice. I will answer this for pm, sorry but this is private.

Only I will repeat an request to all: if someone has problems with my way of writing or my humor, or I hurt of some way. SPEAK. Write in the forum, writes to my mail but don´t be kept silent.

The only public negative reception is GG, publicly they all encourage me to which continues writing in the same way. Thank you
I don't know who 'they' are that are encouraging you, but GG is not the only one concerned about your language and how you choose state your opinions. I for one, had decided some time ago not to engage you in conversation based on your negative statements, I've chosen to ignore them. I don't wish my every visit here to be an argument. If I wanted negative, I'd go to JustJared. But this comment and conversation has forced my hand.

You say you don't wish to make the same mistake twice and that it's private, but I really don't think that's the truth. You like being provocative and a provocateur.

GG and Elaine, I'll second you!

Faustine · Post by **Faustine** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:23 am

Firstsupergirl wrote:
Germangirl wrote:
Lu wrote:
yes, he is a coarse lovely animal in a suit.
I like the relaxed way he is wearing that suit and if ever there is something right about him, its his movements - they are never anything but elegant - may it be walking or standing or whatnot - IMO. ...but yes, his hands ARE deforming the pants
I'm soooo with you, GG!

Thanks for your honesty too.

Liverpool Rules · Post by **Liverpool Rules** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:47 am

Germangirl wrote:I feel they are not overly fitting for men and also, I find it hard to believe, that he will do commercial stuff like that. Time will tell...

Well I dug up the LV website and the commercials are very classy. Click on the "World of Louis Vuitton" and the photo of what ever celeb is on the screen and view the "Journeys" Click that photo.
They have:
1. Sofia & Francis Ford Coppola
2. Keith Richards
3. Mikhail Gorbachev
4. Catherine Deneuve
5. Graf & Agassi

Looks like Annie did a good job.
The behind the scene section is interesting. I can see it happening. It's like a film. But they had better use a different pattern than the monogram ones. There are some basic black ones that look alright.
Under Catalog, Men, Luggage - The Show Summer 08 - Bequia is my favorite!

http://www.louisvuitton.com/web/flash/i ... e_entry_us