Page 1 of 2
Has anyone seen this pic?
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:16 pm
by SmittenDramaKitten
http://www.photoicon.com/the_magazine/4/37
Hiya....
I was browsing my local Borders recently when I came across this magazine which I instantly brought of course (£4.99). There is a very remarkable photo of Daniel on the front cover but no interview and no further pictures inside the magazine. The photo is nice - like all photos of him are - but they've over emphasised his eyes by making his face appear a little thinner and also his face is tanned which is unusual for him. It's Daniel but ... "Alien Daniel"!!! What do you think???
Re: Has anyone seen this pic?
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:31 pm
by Dunda
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:44 pm
by tallulah
Aha! I saw this magazine cover the other day and thought £4.99! I am not paying that! It was in a sealed cover and I knew there would only be one picture of Dan.
Saying that it is amazing what the printers can do with air brushing and making actors look alot slimmer and also enhancing their eye colour. Believe me we would all look gorgeous if the printers played around with our pictures!
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:22 pm
by SmittenDramaKitten
{Dunda} ... Thanks for adding the other pics. I was not aware of the Russian site. Perhaps it's just Daniels 'supernatural beauty' that makes these photos so amazing! I still think he looks a little too skinny in the pics and could do with a good feed!!!!!
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:44 pm
by Laredo
Another necklace to guess about or have we on another thread ?
What is the mag about if there is just pics , no articals ?
Re: Has anyone seen this pic?
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:15 pm
by zonzi
yep, so much skinny for my liking
Has anyone seen this pic?
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:14 pm
by PAMELA BRAMMER
I saw this mag in WH Smith the other day and its really strange that whenever Dan is on a magazine cover it leaps out at you from all the others that are on the shelf. I seem to be drawn to them!!!
Pam
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:52 pm
by tallulah
The magazine is just a photography magazine - for people who take alot of pictures. It is probably discussing best ways to take a shot etc
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:07 pm
by agrippina
Now there might be an idea for a new photo thread (should we need one?!): Daniel wearing jewellery...
Grip
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:08 pm
by Elaine_Figgis
agrippina wrote:Now there might be an idea for a new photo thread (should we need one?!): Daniel wearing jewellery...
Grip
Go for it!
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:48 pm
by Liverpool Rules
I found this photo, is it? I don't know. There is a tatoo on the left shoulder and none on that infamous inner right ankle. But for the sake of the tatoo count I thought I'd just bring it forward and let the experts tell.
Is this Daniel????
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:23 am
by Elaine_Figgis
Liverpool Rules wrote:I found this photo, is it? I don't know. There is a tatoo on the left shoulder and none on that infamous inner right ankle. But for the sake of the tatoo count I thought I'd just bring it forward and let the experts tell.
Is this Daniel????
no way
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:13 am
by gugita14
Elaine_Figgis wrote:Liverpool Rules wrote:I found this photo, is it? I don't know. There is a tatoo on the left shoulder and none on that infamous inner right ankle. But for the sake of the tatoo count I thought I'd just bring it forward and let the experts tell.
Is this Daniel????
no way
Heck no, that's that guy who dated Britney Spears.....Kevin Federline I believe.
Oh well, everyone makes mistakes.
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:25 pm
by Liverpool Rules
gugita14 wrote:Elaine_Figgis wrote:Liverpool Rules wrote:I found this photo, is it? I don't know. There is a tatoo on the left shoulder and none on that infamous inner right ankle. But for the sake of the tatoo count I thought I'd just bring it forward and let the experts tell.
Is this Daniel????
no way
Heck no, that's that guy who dated Britney Spears.....Kevin Federline I believe.
Oh well, everyone makes mistakes.
I had a bad website! Somone has this photo in their Dainel collage! I guess they got confused by the tatoo. Although this tatoo is on the left arm it's not in the same location. So I'm not "that crazy" for checking with the experts, right? I'm going to delete that ugly imposter's photo over the weekend.
This from the Bed Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:09 pm
by redluna
Liverpool Rules wrote:
This from the Bed Thread
This tattoo is only a fake for the movie Infamous