Page 1 of 31

Skyfall Awards

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:39 pm
by Germangirl
Its obvious, there will be some :mrgreen: So, lets celebrate it with a thread.



From my friend Sandy over at MI6
Just saw something on TV but don't really know in which thread to put it but CNN places Skyfall as a top Oscar contender!

Oh really? For best picture?

Yes, particularly best picture! But then they placed it as top contender in general.

____________________________________________________________

I will make a list with all the awards its gonna be up to, never mind, if it wins or not.

1) Oscar 10 list for visual effects

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 8:50 pm
by Germangirl

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:46 pm
by Elvenstar
THR has SF in some categories
but as a lock only in sound

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/race/l ... rty-392127

Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:44 pm
by Germangirl

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:35 am
by Germangirl
If you look at the rating, its extremely unsatisfying, that films, who are below it, get Oscar buzz. Only Argo tops SF.

90% Killing Them Softly 30/11
86% The Collection 30/11
69% Universal Soldier: Day of Reckoning 30/11
More…
Top Box Office
46% The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2 $43.6M
92% Skyfall $35.5M
91% Lincoln $25.7M
76% Rise of the Guardians $23.8M
87% Life of Pi $22.5M
86% Wreck-it Ralph $16.6M
11% Red Dawn $14.3M
77% Flight $8.5M
90% Silver Linings Playbook $4.4M
95% Argo

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:31 pm
by Elvenstar
well at metacritic SF is at 81% so different ratings - different scores

SF is a Bond film & a blockbuster so naturally it will ruin its chances in most of the 'serious' awards
still lots of chances at Baftas, Satellites, some tech guilds & Saturns

soon the critix circles will give out awards so we'll get a better outlook at its chances

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:59 pm
by Germangirl
Elvenstar wrote:well at metacritic SF is at 81% so different ratings - different scores

SF is a Bond film & a blockbuster so naturally it will ruin its chances in most of the 'serious' awards
still lots of chances at Baftas, Satellites, some tech guilds & Saturns

soon the critix circles will give out awards so we'll get a better outlook at its chances
Lincoln and Argo are a bit better there with 86% but still other contenders have less. But you right, it will get its fair share.

Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:58 pm
by Germangirl
On the short list for visual effects. I doubt, it will be in the top 5, but its nice to see it tere.

http://www.deadline.com/2012/11/oscars- ... sts-named/

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:25 pm
by Elvenstar
^same

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:19 pm
by Elvenstar
2 noms from the International Online Film Critics Poll

Best Production Design

Rick Carter – Lincoln
Nathan Crowley, Kevin Kavanaugh – The Dark Knight Rises
Maria Djurkovic – Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
David Crank, Jack Fish – The Master
Dennis Gassner – Skyfall
Best Visual Effects

The Avengers
Black Swan
The Dark Knight Rises
Skyfall
The Tree of Life
http://www.flickeringmyth.com/2012/12/i ... -poll.html

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:27 pm
by Germangirl
I can't help but smile at the thought of Mr. Pitt tanking big time, because it just shows, there is no such thing as a BO garant anymore. Had C&A been a good film, it would have been a success, but like with films from people like Pitt or Clooney etc, if the film is not to peoples liking, they are not going to spend any money on it.

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:40 pm
by caramel
Germangirl wrote:I can't help but smile at the thought of Mr. Pitt tanking big time, because it just shows, there is no such thing as a BO garant anymore. Had C&A been a good film, it would have been a success, but like with films from people like Pitt or Clooney etc, if the film is not to peoples liking, they are not going to spend any money on it.
I agree about the BO guarantee not being there just because we have a big name attached to it.
But to be fair here Killing them softly has a budget of about $18 Mil only.
So it should be fine financially. It is certified fresh at RT as well.
Even if it makes 40 - 50 mil overall it should be considered a success.

EDIT - Just read the Deadline article, they sound pretty dismal about this movie but Boxofficemojo says otherwise, so who knows :dunno:

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 1:03 pm
by Maybelline
I would watch Killing Them Softly because of Ray Liotta. After a few plastic surgery accidents in the past it seems like he is back to old hotness. But I don't have the money and time at the moment.

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 1:44 pm
by Dunda
Maybelline wrote:I would watch Killing Them Softly because of Ray Liotta. After a few plastic surgery accidents in the past it seems like he is back to old hotness. But I don't have the money and time at the moment.
I fell for him in watching Dominick and Eugene back in 88/89.
One of the very few movies with 100% at RT :lol:, shame only 67% of the audience liked it.


But couldn't make it through is late movies because I could stand what he had done to his face.

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:39 pm
by tbossmc2000
I am going to see Kinning them softly, I love James Gandlifini and Ray Liotta. Brad Pitt is not that bad. From what I see in the trailers it looks pretty good.